• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS LUCERA DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. EVIS LUCERA DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number TJF-260V
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "critically ill patients with biliary obstruction and cholangitis: bedside fluoroscopic-free endoscopic drainage versus percutaneous drainage." abstract: severe acute cholangitis is a life-threatening medical emergency.Endoscopic biliary drainage (ebd) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (ptbd) is usually used for biliary decompression.However, it can be risky to transport a critical patient to the radiology unit.We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between bedside, radiation-free ebd and fluoroscopic-guided ptbd in patients under critical care.Methods: a retrospective study was conducted on critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with biliary obstruction and cholangitis from (b)(6) 2011 to (b)(6) 2020.Results: a total of 16 patients receiving ebd and 31 patients receiving ptbd due to severe acute cholangitis were analyzed.In the ebd group, biliary drainage was successfully conducted in 15 (93.8%) patients.Only one patient (6.25%) encountered post-procedure pancreatitis.The 30-day mortality rate was no difference between the 2 groups (32.72% vs.31.25%, p 0.96).Based on multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for the 30-day mortality were a medical history of malignancy other than pancreatobiliary origin (hr: 5.27, 95% confidence interval ci: 1.01¿27.57) and emergent dialysis (hr: 7.30, 95% ci: 2.20¿24.24).Conclusions: bedside ebd is safe and as effective as percutaneous drainage in critically ill patients.It provides lower risks in patient transportation but does require experienced endoscopists to perform the procedure.In our hospital, the percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage (ptbd) was typically used for biliary decompression.Some patients received bedside ebd in the icu without fluoroscopy due to various contraindications for ptbd insertion.Adverse events: n=1: mild pancreatitis.N=5: death after procedure with olympus device.Based on multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for the 30-day mortality were a medical history of malignancy other than pancreatobiliary origin (hr: 5.27, 95% confidence interval ci: 1.01¿27.57) and emergent dialysis (hr: 7.30, 95% ci: 2.20¿24.24).Conclusions: bedside ebd is safe and as effective as percutaneous drainage in critically ill patients.This article includes 2 reports as follows: (b)(6): since the literature described "tjf-260," we selected "tjf-260v" as a representative product; adverse event.(b)(6): since the literature described "tjf-260," we selected "tjf-260v" as a representative product; deaths.This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(6): since the literature described "tjf-260," we selected "tjf-260v" as a representative product; adverse event.
 
Event Description
The author provided additional information and reported there was no relationship between the olympus device and adverse event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information from the author.New information added to b5.Correction to b1: based on the author's response, the event has been determined not reportable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS LUCERA DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
DUODENOVIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key14219220
MDR Text Key290167246
Report Number8010047-2022-07112
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTW
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTJF-260V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/31/2022
Initial Date FDA Received04/27/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received05/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-