STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH PRIMARY TRITANIUM HEMI SOLIDBACK CUP 54MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 500-03-54E |
Device Problems
Malposition of Device (2616); Unintended Movement (3026)
|
Patient Problems
Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 04/11/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This pi is for the patient's right hip, which has been revised.It was reported that the patient has bilateral stryker hips.The acetabular shells for both sides have 'spun out' and are now oriented vertically and retroverted.Patient's right hip was revised on (b)(6) 2022 (shell, head and liner were revised.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the revised head or liner).The surgeon plans to revise the patient's left hip, date currently unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Device not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
This pi is for the patient's right hip, which has been revised.It was reported that the patient has bilateral stryker hips.The acetabular shells for both sides have 'spun out' and are now oriented vertically and retroverted.Patient's right hip was revised on (b)(6) 2022 (shell, head and liner were revised.Rep confirmed there are no allegations against the revised head or liner).The surgeon plans to revise the patient's left hip, date currently unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event an event regarding malposition involving an trident shell was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection: visual inspection of the shell shows bone and tissue residue consistent with being implanted for a period of time.Visual inspection of the head and liner show scratches consistent with explantation.Material analysis, functional and dimensional inspections were not performed as these aspects were not in question.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Further information such as pathology reports, pre- and post-operative x-rays and the primary operative report as well as patient history and follow-up notes are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|