STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH X3 TRIATHLON CS INS SIZE 4 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 5531-G-409 |
Device Problems
Degraded (1153); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 03/23/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
The following was reported: knee revision.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Reported event: an event regarding wear involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event was only confirmed for wear based on product evaluation.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device confirms that the device was worn/damaged at a posterior edge which is consistent with articulation against hard object.Explantation damage was also observed on the insert.Dimensional inspection: not performed as the device was returned damaged.Functional inspection: not performed as the device was returned damaged.Material analysis: not performed as there is no indication that the event was a result of a material integrity issue.If further information becomes available additional testing will be performed.-clinician review: the available medical records were provided to the consulting clinician for a review which noted," this failure was specifically related to the polyethylene component which had to be replaced at about six years following implantation.I can confirm that the event occurred because i saw both the primary and revision operation report although i did not see a postop x-ray after the revision.It would be helpful to have an analysis of the implant to determine the type of failure of the polyethylene.Surgical technique factors, patient factors and implant factors can contribute to this event.In this case the patient's bmi certainly can contribute.I cannot comment on whether there was instability or a tight flexion gap." -device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusion: the event was only confirmed for wear based on product evaluation.The available medical records were provided to the consulting clinician for a review which noted," this failure was specifically related to the polyethylene component which had to be replaced at about six years following implantation.I can confirm that the event occurred because i saw both the primary and revision operation report although i did not see a postop x-ray after the revision.It would be helpful to have an analysis of the implant to determine the type of failure of the polyethylene.Surgical technique factors, patient factors and implant factors can contribute to this event.In this case the patient's bmi certainly can contribute.I cannot comment on whether there was instability or a tight flexion gap." no further investigation is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available, the pi will be reopened.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following was reported: knee revision.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|