• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET; INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET; INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9610ES14
Device Problem Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Edwards received notification from our affiliate in iran.As reported, this was a case of an implant of a sapien 3 valve, by transfemoral approach.During the procedure, due to heavy calcification in the right femoral, the tip of the esheath was damaged.The shape of the esheath changed a little.It was decided to use a new esheath in the left femoral access site.The patient outcome was good, and the procedure was successful.Per follow-up with the initial reporter, the esheath damage was identified as a distal tip tear.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is in progress.A supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a no product return engineering evaluation was performed.The device history record (dhr) review did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance issues that would have contributed to the event.A lot history review was performed and revealed no other complaints relating to this event.During the manufacturing process, the device was visually inspected and tested several times.All the inspections are conducted on 100% of units, except in the case of product verification (pv) testing, where the tested units are chosen on a sampling basis.All tested sample units for this lot passed pv testing.These inspections and tests during the manufacturing process support that it is unlikely that a non-conformance contributed to the reported complaint.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint sheath distal tip torn was unable to be confirmed due to no definitive characterization made by the site for specified sheath damage.However, no manufacturing nonconformance was identified during evaluation.Review of the dhr and lot history did not provide any indication that a manufacturing non-conformance would have contributed to the complaints.A review of manufacturing mitigations supports that the sheath has proper inspections in place to detect issues related to the complaint events.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, no abnormalities were noted during device unpacking or preparation.Per the complaint description, ''due to heavy calcification in the right femoral, the tip of the esheath was damaged, the shape of the esheath changed a little''.Per the training manual, ''push force can vary due to angle of access and insertion, thv size, vessel diameter, tortuosity and degree of calcification''.Calcification can reduce the vessel diameter and may increase restriction at the distal tip, which can lead to an increased potential for calcification to catch onto the sheath distal tip during advancement and tear it.As such, patient factors (calcification) may have contributed to the complaint event.However, a definitive root cause was unable to be determined at this time.No ifu/training manual deficiencies were identified.Therefore, no capa or product risk assessment (pra) escalation is required at this time.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS ESHEATH INTRODUCER SET
Type of Device
INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key14361607
MDR Text Key300027615
Report Number2015691-2022-05664
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00690103191219
UDI-Public(01)00690103191219(17)231012(10)64040155
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K200258
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/12/2023
Device Model Number9610ES14
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot Number64040155
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/18/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/11/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/10/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/12/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-