• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR; DXE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR; DXE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hemoptysis (1887); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 04/11/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.From the information provided, there is no indication that there was any device malfunction, nonconformance, or misuse that contributed to the reported event.Potential adverse events in the indigo aspiration system instructions for use (ifu) include, but are not limited to, hematoma or hemorrhage at access site, vessel spasm, thrombosis, dissection, or perforation, ischemia, including death.The product lot number was not provided, therefore, the manufacturing records could not be reviewed.
 
Event Description
During its post-market surveillance activities on (b)(6) 2022 penumbra inc.Became aware of a journal article titled, "recurrent pulmonary embolism in a patient after covid-19 treated with percutaneous and surgical approach" (kosiorek et al.2021).The event date was not provided; however, the article was received on 11-apr-2021 and documents a single case of catheter-directed therapy (cdt) to treat pulmonary artery (pa) embolism using an indigo system separator, an indigo system aspiration catheter, and a penumbra engine (engine).During the procedure, several passes were made with the indigo system separator and the indigo system aspiration catheter resulting in partial thrombus removal.However, the subsegmental branch of the left pa was perforated by a wire resulting in hemoptysis.The patient was administered protamine sulfate and no bleeding site was detected via angiography.After the procedure, low-molecular-weight heparin (lmwh) was initially reduced but was reintroduced at a full therapeutic dose over the next twenty-four hours.Four days later, the patient developed symptoms of cardiogenic shock with tachycardia, hypotension, and hypoxemia with a need for inotropic and vasopressor support and echocardiographic signs of pulmonary embolism recurrence.Surgical embolectomy was elected by the pulmonary embolism response team (pert) and the periprocedural course was uncomplicated.The six-month follow-up was free of venous thromboembolism events (vte).The identity of the wire which perforated the left pa was not specified within the published literature source.Therefore, the relationship between the perforation and the indigo system separator is unknown.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article, nor to match the events reported with previously reported complaints.Therefore, this report addresses all events within this literature source.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INDIGO SYSTEM SEPARATOR
Type of Device
DXE
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key14366904
MDR Text Key291493146
Report Number3005168196-2022-00209
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodePL
PMA/PMN Number
K160533
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,05/11/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/14/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-