• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pneumonia (2011); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Hematuria (2558); Unspecified Kidney or Urinary Problem (4503); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature article: "significance of presenting for ureteral stones that were tuled at osaka labor disaster hospital." abstract: [purpose] the significance of prestenting for ureteral stones subjected to tul was examined.[subjects and methods] 192 cases were enrolled from 2012 to 2019.Stone free (sf) is defined as 4 mm or less.[results] the subject patients were 19 to 88 years old.Prestenting was performed in 72 cases, and 154 cases (802%) became sf.In multivariate analysis, performances status (ps) was poor (p = 0.013), ct values were high (p = 0.0015), and the frequency of prestenting was significantly higher except for ca stones (p = 0.0215).However, there was no significant difference in sf.[discussion / conclusion] as mentioned above, the background factors are quite different, so it was felt that further study was needed on the significance of prestenting.The authors reported the following adverse events: 1.(clavien-dindo classification g3 or higher) were found in 25 cases 2.Urinary tract infections in 19 cases 3.And hydronephrosis in 3 cases 4.Hematuria 1 case 5.Hematuria & bladder tamponade & urinary tract infection 1 case 6.Aspiration pneumonia 1 case.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key14374123
MDR Text Key291504899
Report Number8010047-2022-08124
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170340321
UDI-Public04953170340321
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K072957
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 03/09/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/03/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-