As reported, during a ureteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram, the distal end of a filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set cracked.The tether was removed from the device with scissors prior to placement.After the device was inserted into the patient and advanced over a roadrunner guidewire, the crack was noted.A new device of the same product reference was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event description: as reported, during a ureteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram, the distal end of a filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set cracked.The tether was removed from the device with scissors prior to placement.After the device was inserted into the patient and advanced over a roadrunner guidewire, the crack was noted.A new device of the same product reference was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, specifications, the instructions for use, and quality control procedures.One filiform double pigtail ureteral stent was returned for investigation.The stent was wired with a stock 0.038 wire guide and a tear at the tip of the product was noticed.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The information provided upon review of complaint file, device history record, complaint history, and quality control documents did not provide evidence to support that the device was manufactured out of specification or to suggest items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house were nonconforming.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the stent shape was adequately inspected during quality control.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." the cause for the damaged stent was unable to be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|