• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 133624
Device Problems Break (1069); Crack (1135)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/26/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
 
Event Description
As reported, during a ureteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram, the distal end of a filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set cracked.The tether was removed from the device with scissors prior to placement.After the device was inserted into the patient and advanced over a roadrunner guidewire, the crack was noted.A new device of the same product reference was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Event description: as reported, during a ureteroscopy and retrograde pyelogram, the distal end of a filiform double pigtail ureteral stent set cracked.The tether was removed from the device with scissors prior to placement.After the device was inserted into the patient and advanced over a roadrunner guidewire, the crack was noted.A new device of the same product reference was used to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention due to this occurrence.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Investigation ¿ evaluation a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, specifications, the instructions for use, and quality control procedures.One filiform double pigtail ureteral stent was returned for investigation.The stent was wired with a stock 0.038 wire guide and a tear at the tip of the product was noticed.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other complaints associated with the complaint device lot.The information provided upon review of complaint file, device history record, complaint history, and quality control documents did not provide evidence to support that the device was manufactured out of specification or to suggest items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house were nonconforming.A review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the stent shape was adequately inspected during quality control.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: how supplied "upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred." the cause for the damaged stent was unable to be determined.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and we will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FILIFORM DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key14396831
MDR Text Key291831915
Report Number1820334-2022-00715
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
UDI-Device Identifier10827002151458
UDI-Public(01)10827002151458(17)240623(10)14046481
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeMY
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number133624
Device Lot Number14046481
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/26/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/19/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received08/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ROADRUNNER GUIDEWIRE
-
-