• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Corroded (1131); Fracture (1260)
Patient Problems Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/24/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Patient presented with high lead impedance and underwent x-rays.On chest and neck x-rays the leads appear intact and connected to the pulse generator.The x-ray images were received and reviewed by the manufacturer.The generator placement was determined to be normal in the upper right chest.Based on the images provided, the feedthrough wires were intact, and the connector pin appeared to be fully inserted.The lead was visualized in the chest and neck.It appears that a strain relief loop and bend were attempted but not according to labelling.The loop was placed directly following the electrodes and the bend was not sufficient.There were 3 visualized tie downs present on the lead, none were securing the loop.A portion of the lead was visualized to be routed behind the generator.The lead was assessed for fracture and discontinuities on the visible portions of the lead however none were noted.Based on the x-rays received, the cause of the high impedance cannot be confirmed; however, any fractures or microfractures on the portions of the lead that were not visible cannot be ruled out.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Clinic notes received noting that the patient (b)(6) depression worsened after their device was turned off on (b)(6) 2029 and also increased anxiety.The patient (b)(6) s device was programmed back on 5/2 and they have been referred for surgery to undergo a revision due to the high impedance.No known surgical intervention has occurred to date.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B1 adverse event or product problem, corrected data: initial report inadvertently forgot to also select adverse event b5 describe event or problem, corrected data: initial report inadvertently left out relevant information b6 relevant tests/laboratory data, including dates, corrected data: initial report inadvertently left out relevant information f10 adverse event problem, corrected data: initial report inadvertently left out code 'e020201' and 'e020202'.
 
Event Description
Patient underwent full revision surgery.The explanted products have not been received by product analysis to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5 describe event or problem, corrected data: supplemental #02 report inadvertently left out relevant information from the pathology report.
 
Event Description
Additional information received noting that per the pathology report the lead came out in pieces and one end of the lead wire was flattened.It was also reported that during the explant surgery the surgeon had to manipulate the patient's nerve more than he normally would.The explanted generator and lead were received but product analysis is still underway.
 
Event Description
Product analysis was completed on the returned generator and lead.An interrogation and system diagnostic tests were performed.The device output signal was monitored for more than 24-hrs and a comprehensive automated electrical evaluation (shows an ifi=no condition) was performed.No anomalies were seen, and the device performed according to functional specifications.There were no performance, or any other type of adverse conditions found with the pulse generator.During the visual analysis of the second portion, coil2 was found to be broken.The broken ends of the coil appeared dark and showed signs of pitting.Due to the pitting, the fracture mechanism could not be ascertained.Continuity checks of the returned lead portions were performed during the functional analysis, and no other discontinuities were identified.One half set of setscrew marks were found near the end tip of the connector pin, indicating the lead connector had not been fully inserted into the cavity of the pulse generator at one time.The location of the two full setscrew marks found on the lead connector pin provide evidence that the lead connector pin was inserted completely, and a good mechanical and electrical connection was present at least twice.Canted spring scratches were observed on the connector ring surface.No anomalies preventing the connector pin from being fully inserted into the generator were noted.The condition of the returned lead portions is consistent with conditions that typically exist following an explant procedure.
 
Event Description
The lead was visualized in the chest and neck.The lead was visualized to be implanted upside down.Reverse polarity of the electrodes (positive electrode is placed cranial, negative electrode is placed caudal) can cause the therapy to be delivered away from the brain on the vagus nerve which would not supply adequate therapy.However this would not be expected to cause high impedance.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5 describe event or problem, corrected data: initial report inadvertently did not note that the electrodes were seen to have inverted placement in the x-rays provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
dana sprague
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2816672681
MDR Report Key14452607
MDR Text Key292201457
Report Number1644487-2022-00565
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/05/2008
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1330
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/24/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/20/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/13/2022
08/08/2022
09/13/2022
10/19/2022
01/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/13/2022
09/02/2022
10/04/2022
10/26/2022
01/03/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-