• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 442970
Device Problem False Negative Result (1225)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/01/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that while testing with bd max¿ ct/gc/tv 20 false negative results for tv target occurred over 6 month period.Pap smears obtained positive results for tv on the same samples.There is no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported to bd-marketing 20 false negative specimens for tv target over a 6 month period.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: unknown.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while testing with bd max¿ ct/gc/tv 20 false negative results for tv target occurred over 6 month period.Pap smears obtained positive results for tv on the same samples.There is no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported to bd-marketing 20 false negative specimens for tv target over a 6 month period.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: the complaint investigation for discrepant result when using the bd max ct/gc/tv (ref 442970) from unknown lot was performed by the verification of complaints history.Despite multiple attempts made to receive information from the customer, no data was provided for the investigation.The investigation was thus limited.Customer reported that, over a period of 6 months, 20 out of 300 samples gave a negative result with the bd max¿ ct/gc/tv assay whereas the pap smear test showed a positive result for the tv target.Based on the available information, and without run data, bd is unable to identify a cause for the customer discrepant results.Nonetheless, no reagent issue is suspected.There is no indication of a reagent issue based on the analysis of the complaints received for discrepant results on bd max ct/gc/tv products.The root cause was not identified.Bd cannot confirm the complaint based on the investigation that was performed.H3 other text : see h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV
Type of Device
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key14518490
MDR Text Key292992279
Report Number1119779-2022-00768
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUY
UDI-Device Identifier00382904429706
UDI-Public00382904429706
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151589
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/15/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Model Number442970
Device Catalogue Number442970
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 04/27/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/26/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/15/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-