• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION REZUM; UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES) Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-D-PROSTATE HEALTH
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Urinary Retention (2119); Stenosis (2263); Ulcer (2274); Hematuria (2558); Dysuria (2684); Unspecified Mental, Emotional or Behavioural Problem (4430); Urinary Incontinence (4572); Insufficient Information (4580); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 04/28/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and regretted having the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event the exact date of the event is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience he ever felt.He stated that the procedure caused retrograde ejaculation and that he regretted having it performed.No additional patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptom of pain is a known risk associated with water vapor therapy procedures and is noted as such in the device instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device use was assigned to this investigation.Correction: h6 patient codes - removed code that was redundant.B3.Date of event the exact date of the event is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and regretted having the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6 patient codes - removed code that was redundant.B3.Date of event: the exact date of the event is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptoms of pain, retrograde ejaculation, urinary retention, hematuria, and stenosis are known risks associated with water vapor therapy procedures and are noted as such in the device instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device use was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and regretted he having the procedure.The patient later contacted boston scientific via phone to provide additional details.He stated that on the day of the procedure, he was asked by the staff if he had taken his valium prescription.He told them that he had not received a prescription, and the staff proceeded with the procedure without any pain medication.He stated he experienced the worst pain he had ever experienced.After the procedure, he was instructed to try to urinate but he was unable to.After that, a catheter was placed.After the catheter had been in place for nine days, the patient started experiencing bleeding which was characterized by deep red blood in the catheter bag.He immediately contacted his urologist but was unable to get a hold of him.He called an ambulance and was then transferred to the hospital where he was given a sedative and instructed to see his urologist.Approximately two weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient underwent a hernia repair surgery.He spoke with the general surgeon regarding his pain and the surgeon referred him back to his urologist.The patient went back to his urologist and was placed on flomax.Approximately 4 weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient told his urologist he was unable to urinate and was instructed to come into the office.At some point in time the patient had undergone a cystoscope but the date it was performed was not provided.A second procedure was then done in order to make incisions to the bladder neck due to narrowing of the bladder neck.The patient believes the narrowing of the bladder neck was due to the water vapor therapy procedure and the catheter that was placed after he could not urinate for 4-6 days.He was also given pills that took his pain away and turned his pee orange for a few days.He then ended up at the hospital again due to pain while urinating which caused the patient to pull his sciatic nerve.The patient is currently using a heating pad for his pain as well as over-the-counter (otc) anti-inflammatory medication when needed.He reports he has suffered from stress ulcers, pain, and is seeing a therapist for the experience and pain he is in.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptom of pain is a known risk associated with water vapor therapy procedures and is noted as such in the device instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device use was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and he regretted having the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptom of pain is a known risk associated with water vapor therapy procedures and is noted as such in the device instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device use was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and regretted he having the procedure.The patient later contacted boston scientific via phone to provide additional details.He stated that on the day of the procedure, he was asked by the staff if he had taken his valium prescription.He told them that he had not received a prescription, and the staff proceeded with the procedure without any pain medication.He stated he experienced the worst pain he had ever experienced.After the procedure, he was instructed to try to urinate but he was unable to.After that, a catheter was placed.After the catheter had been in place for nine days, the patient started experiencing bleeding which was characterized by deep red blood in the catheter bag.He immediately contacted his urologist but was unable to get a hold of him.He called an ambulance and was then transferred to the hospital where he was given a sedative and instructed to see his urologist.Approximately two weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient underwent a hernia repair surgery.He spoke with the general surgeon regarding his pain and the surgeon referred him back to his urologist.The patient went back to his urologist and was placed on flomax.Approximately 4 weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient told his urologist he was unable to urinate and was instructed to come into the office.At some point in time the patient had undergone a cystoscope but the date it was performed was not provided.A second procedure was then done in order to make incisions to the bladder neck due to narrowing of the bladder neck.The patient believes the narrowing of the bladder neck was due to the water vapor therapy procedure and the catheter that was placed after he could not urinate for 4-6 days.He was also given pills that took his pain away and turned his pee orange for a few days.He then ended up at the hospital again due to pain while urinating which caused the patient to pull his sciatic nerve.The patient is currently using a heating pad for his pain as well as over-the-counter (otc) anti-inflammatory medication when needed.He reports he has suffered from stress ulcers, pain, and is seeing a therapist for the experience and pain he is in.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information available, there was no device available for analysis and there was no report of a device performance allegation during treatment.The reported patient symptoms of pain, retrograde ejaculation, urinary retention, hematuria, and stenosis are known risks associated with water vapor therapy procedures and are noted as such in the device instructions for use.Based on the information available, a conclusion code of known inherent risk of device use was assigned to this investigation.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a patient via social media that he underwent a prostate procedure and it was the most painful experience ever felt.The procedure gave the patient retrograde ejaculation and regretted he having the procedure.The patient later contacted boston scientific via phone to provide additional details.He stated that on the day of the procedure, he was asked by the staff if he had taken his valium prescription.He told them that he had not received a prescription, and the staff proceeded with the procedure without any pain medication.He stated he experienced the worst pain he had ever experienced.After the procedure, he was instructed to try to urinate but he was unable to.After that, a catheter was placed.After the catheter had been in place for nine days, the patient started experiencing bleeding which was characterized by deep red blood in the catheter bag.He immediately contacted his urologist but was unable to get a hold of him.He called an ambulance and was then transferred to the hospital where he was given a sedative and instructed to see his urologist.Approximately two weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient underwent a hernia repair surgery.He spoke with the general surgeon regarding his pain and the surgeon referred him back to his urologist.The patient went back to his urologist and was placed on flomax.Approximately 4 weeks after the water vapor therapy procedure, the patient told his urologist he was unable to urinate and was instructed to come into the office.At some point in time the patient had undergone a cystoscope but the date it was performed was not provided.A second procedure was then done in order to make incisions to the bladder neck due to narrowing of the bladder neck.The patient believes the narrowing of the bladder neck was due to the water vapor therapy procedure and the catheter that was placed after he could not urinate for 4-6 days.He was also given pills that took his pain away and turned his pee orange for a few days.He then ended up at the hospital again due to pain while urinating which caused the patient to pull his sciatic nerve.The patient is currently using a heating pad for his pain as well as over-the-counter (otc) anti-inflammatory medication when needed.He reports he has suffered from stress ulcers, pain, and is seeing a therapist for the experience and pain he is in.On (b)(6) 2024 the patient reported he is still frustrated and suffering from depression.He is experiencing pain when urinating and is also dripping urine.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REZUM
Type of Device
UNIT, ELECTROSURGICAL ENDOSCOPIC (WITH OR WITHOUT ACCESSORIES)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer Contact
farshad fahimi
4100 hamline avenue north
building c
saint paul, MN 55112
MDR Report Key14522322
MDR Text Key292807069
Report Number2124215-2022-18255
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/22/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-D-PROSTATE HEALTH
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-D-PROSTATE HEALTH
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/08/2022
Initial Date FDA Received05/27/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/01/2022
06/16/2022
01/02/2023
01/27/2023
03/01/2023
04/25/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/01/2022
06/30/2022
01/23/2023
02/15/2023
03/21/2023
05/22/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-