• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC GUARDWIRE TEMPORARY OCCLUSION SYSTEM; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC GUARDWIRE TEMPORARY OCCLUSION SYSTEM; CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Embolism/Embolus (4438)
Event Date 09/03/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Title: carotid artery stenting for patients with occipital¿vertebral anastomosis.Year: 2019 reference: doi:10.1177/1591019918802924.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A journal article was submitted for review titled: carotid artery stenting for patients with occipital¿vertebral anastomosis.The purpose of the article was to report the outcomes of carotid artery stenting (cas) for patients with angiographically visible occipital artery¿vertebral artery anastomosis.Seven patients were selected.Four different protection methods were used: distal internal carotid artery protection; carotid flow reversal; seatbelt and airbag technique; and double protection method of protecting both the external and internal carotid artery.Seat belt and air bag technique: after carotid flow reversal a non medtronic embolic protection device was deployed in the distal internal carotid artery (ica).The medtronic percusurge guardwire in the external carotid artery (eca) was deflated and pulled away.The balloon of the guiding catheter was deflated, completing protection.Double protection method: a medtronic percusurge guardwire was used to protect the occipital artery (oa) and the eca.A bilateral transfemoral approach was used and 8-fr and 5-fr guiding catheters were placed into the common carotid artery (cca) together.The medtronic guardwire was placed through the 5-fr guiding catheters in the eca proximal to the oa origin and the non medtronic embolic protection device was advanced and deployed at the distal ica through the 8-fr catheter.Subsequently, the medtronic guardwire was inflated to protect both the oa and eca.After stent placement procedures were completed, both the balloon and filter were deactivated while continuous blood aspiration was performed from the 8-fr launcher guide catheter to eliminate debris pooling beneath the protection balloon.Then the protection balloon was pulled back outside the expanded stent.Stent placement procedures were successfully completed in all cases.Patient 1 was treated with the distal ica protection method using the medtronic guardwire.The patient presented with a large oa¿va anastomosis with cas being completed only using the distal ica protection balloon.Postoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (dwi) s howed a small, high-intensity lesion (embolic particle) at the border of the upper surface of the thalamus, internal capsule and wall of the lateral ventricle body without ischemic symptoms.Patient 3 was treated with the distal ica protection method using the non medtronic embolic protection device.The patient presented with high-intensity lesions on postoperative dwi in the right frontal lobe with no ischaemic symptoms after cas.Patient 6 underwent the double protection method during cas using the non mdt embolic protection device and guardwire.The patient showed no additional high-intensity lesion postoperative dwi.Patient 2 (flow reversal method) used the non medtronic device and guardwire.Patient 4 and 5 (distal ica protection method) used the non mdt embolic protection device.Patient 7 (seat belt and air bag method) used cello and guardwire but dwi could not be performed due to pacemaker implantation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GUARDWIRE TEMPORARY OCCLUSION SYSTEM
Type of Device
CATHETER, EMBOLECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC
37a cherry hill dr
danvers MA 01923
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC, INC
37a cherry hill dr
danvers MA 01923
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14598690
MDR Text Key293341716
Report Number1220452-2022-00041
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K023878
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/03/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/05/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/03/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-