• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE; FLEXIBLE VIDEO URETERORENOSCOPE, REUSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE; FLEXIBLE VIDEO URETERORENOSCOPE, REUSABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V3R
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 05/08/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer reported in a voluntary medwatch report, at the end of a left ureteroscopy using a flexible uretero-reno videoscope, the scope became lodged in the ureter.The indication for the procedure was obstructing left proximal ureteral calculus in excess of 1cm and per computerized tomography (ct), also a question of 5mm distal ureteral stone and refractory renal colic.After several attempts to remove the scope, patient was transported to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eswl) room, after lithotripsy, surgeon got the scope tip down to the mid sacroiliac (si) joint, but it could not be completely removed.The scope was cut just below the handpiece with trauma shears.Care was taken to keep the amplatz wire intact.Fluoroscopy revealed the scope to be at midpoint of the si joint and the amplatz wire in the left upper quadrant within the collecting system.A 12 fr catheter was placed alongside the scope.On post-op day two, the patient returned to surgery for removal of scope.After gentle traction and manipulation, the scope was moved below the level of the si joint.An attempt was made to advance an 11 fr ureteral access sheath over the scope, but resistance was met at left ureterovesical junction, and the sheath would not move any further.Rotation of the sheath did not produce texture consistent with retained stone fragment.Fluoroscopy revealed what appeared to be a break in the external sheath of the ureteroscope.A holmium laser was used on fine cut setting and power setting of 0.8j and 20 hz to extend the full incision of the ureterostomy to around 2 cm.Gentle traction was reapplied and the ureteroscope was removed intact.No significant stone debris was noted.The patient will be scheduled for another ureteroscopy in 4 to 6 weeks to assess quality of mid-ureter and look for any potentially retained stone fragments.The patient¿s symptoms resolved after a few days, but the patient denies interval passage of stone.No further consequences to the patient have been reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
FLEXIBLE VIDEO URETERORENOSCOPE, REUSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
MDR Report Key14620782
MDR Text Key293615851
Report Number2951238-2022-00419
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
UDI-Device Identifier04953170403392
UDI-Public04953170403392
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/08/2022,06/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V3R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date05/08/2022
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer05/08/2022
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received06/07/2022
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
AMPLATZ WIRE
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age29 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight57 KG
-
-