• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TORAX MEDICAL, INC. LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US; ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number LXMC16
Device Problem Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907)
Event Date 05/24/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.No lot number was provided therefore a device history could not be done.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what is the product code? what is the lot number? what was the implant date? what exactly were the patient symptoms? what is meant by ¿hypersensitivity¿? prior to linx placement, did the patient have an egd, ph, and manometry studies done? if yes, could you please share the results? when using the linx sizing device what technique was used to determine the size? did the patient have an autoimmune disease? were there any intra-operative complications during implant? was there any hiatal or crural repair done at the same time as the implant? were there any other contributing factors that led to the removal of the device other than the reported hypersensitivity? does the patient have any of the allergies to metals? if so, what test have been done to test for metal allergies.Was mesh used at time of implant? at the time of removal, was the device found in the correct position/geometry at the time of removal?.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a linx device was explanted due to hypersensitivity.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 2/21/2024.Investigation summary: a suture wire knotted on a wire was observed during the visual assessment.It is known that sometimes, during the explant procedure, a suture is placed on the device to aid in the extraction of the device.Hence, it is presumed that the suture was placed by the explant facility during the explant procedure.Overall review of the device function and dimensions show no anomalies from a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure.Visual analysis was consistent with an explanted device, tooling marks were noted in some beads.Link length and tensile force were found to meet the applicable specifications.Overall, no analysis conclusions relevant to the patient experience were found.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 2/5/2024 d1, d4.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LINX 1.5 16 BEAD US
Type of Device
ANTI-REFLUX IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
TORAX MEDICAL, INC.
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview MN
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
4188 lexington avenue north
shoreview 55126
MDR Report Key14621265
MDR Text Key293469866
Report Number3008766073-2022-00114
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberLXMC16
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/24/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/07/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/26/2024
02/06/2024
02/21/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/05/2024
02/16/2024
02/21/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-