As reported to coloplast, though not verified, the patient with this device experienced the following symptoms and procedures on the according dates: (b)(6) 2017: stage-ii anterior vaginal wall prolapse, stage-i vaginal vault prolapse after hysterectomy, stage-ii posterior vaginal wall prolapse, pubocervical and rectovaginal fascial weakness, incomplete bladder emptying, weak urinary stream, significant redundancy of the colon.Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic-assisted abdominal cystocele repair, posterior repair, robotic-assisted left salpingectomy, cystourethroscopy to evaluate voiding dysfunction, enterocele repair under general anesthesia.(b)(6) 2019: stage i vaginal vault prolapse, pelvic pressure, pelvic floor weakness, bacterial vaginosis, incomplete bladder emptying, uti, urge incontinence, dyspareunia, atrophic vaginitis.(b)(6) 2019: dyspareunia, vaginismus, mesh erosion, urethral caruncle.(b)(6) 2019: dyspareunia, mesh erosion, chronic vaginal infections.(b)(6) 2019: mechanical malfunction of gu device, mesh erosion, dyspareunia.Laparoscopic mesh excision and cystoscopy under general anesthesia.(b)(6) 2019: urinary retention.(b)(6) 2019: mild post-operative surgical pain.(b)(6) 2019: dyspareunia.(b)(6) 2021: chronic pelvic pain.Pudendal nerve root block.(b)(6) 2021: chronic pelvic pain.Pudendal nerve root block.
|
Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.The lot number (5666907) was reviewed for complaint trend, nonconforming report and capa.Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.
|