It was reported that a patient's ultrathane mac-loc locking loop multipurpose drainage catheter dislodged.The device was required for a study procedure (mdr-1919) for suprapubic urinary drainage and was placed on (b)(6) 2021.Dilation was performed prior to catheter placement, then the device was successfully placed via ultrasound guidance.Drainage was successfully established.On (b)(6) 2021, the device was accidentally dislodged.The next day, a new suprapubic catheter was successfully placed.No other adverse events were reported due to this occurrence.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.Additional information: b5, b7, correction: h6 (annex e): this report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
Additional information was provided on 22jun2022.Complete fluid evacuation was not achieved using this device as it was being used as a suprapubic catheter for urinary drainage.On (b)(6) 2021, 25 days post procedure, the patient accidentally dislodged the suprapubic catheter.Urinary retention occurred because the catheter had been dislodged.
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation: it was reported that a patient's ultrathane mac-loc locking loop multipurpose drainage catheter (rpn: ult10.2-38-25-p-6s-clm-rh lot#: 13589750) dislodged.The device was required for a study procedure (mdr-1919) for suprapubic urinary drainage and was placed in the bladder on 13jan2021.Dilation was performed prior to catheter placement, then the device was successfully placed via ultrasound guidance.Drainage was successfully established.On 07feb2021, the device was accidentally dislodged and the patient experienced urine retention.The next day, a new suprapubic catheter was successfully placed.No other adverse events were reported due to this occurrence.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control, and instructions for use (ifu) of the device, were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation; therefore, no physical examinations could be conducted.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot revealed no relevant non-conformances.A database search did not identify any other events associated with the reported device lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The instructions for use (ifu) [ t_multi2_rev1, multipurpose drainage catheter] states the following.¿how supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.Intended use: multiple drainage catheters are intended for percutaneous drainage applications (e.G nephrostomy, biliary and abscess), either by direct stick or seldinger access technique.Warnings: if a catheter has become malposition or if drainage ceases, the catheter should be promptly exchanged or removed.References: these instructions for use are based on experience from physicians and (or) their published literature.Refer to your local cook sales representative for information on available literature.¿ based on the available information, no device return, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded the cause of this event cannot be traced to the device.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|