• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 1000; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 1000
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Ecchymosis (1818); Neck Pain (2433); Implant Pain (4561)
Event Date 03/22/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient felt muscle tightness around the area of their vns for several weeks.More recently patient has felt vns move from her collar bone more into her left breast.When palpating the tubing for the device could be felt and there is a large bruise on her left breast.The vns is firing every 2 minutes without a seizure being present and causing a lot of pain to patient.Her bruising has gotten bigger.Vns was disabled with magnet.The device is now moving around in patient¿s breast, the bruise around nipple has gotten bigger and the entire breast is sensitive to touch and motion along with being warm to touch.The shocks are occurring approximately every 2 minutes.They cause her to cough and choke every time they fire.The shock feeling goes all the way up her neck and around her shoulders.Some shocks are stronger than others.Patient has been taking ibuprofen - 400 to 600 mg alternating with tylenol.It will help with the muscle pain but will not alleviate it.Patient reports with ibuprofen her pain is a 3/10.No fevers, no concerns with patient¿s incisions, no discharge from her nipple and no drainage from incisions.Entire generator is palpable and easily able to be manipulated/moved.Per surgeon, vns generator does not appear to be functioning adequately.Recommended that patient continue to follow neurology's recommendation to leave vns off.Patient has been referred for surgical revision of incision.At time of surgery the generator had moved down into her breast tissue.Upon further evaluation, provider may have encountered a small amount of pus.Cultures were sent.She is not sure if it is pus or just drainage from the breast tissue.The area was thoroughly decorated along with the generator.The generator was re-anchored to a different pocket.The patient is being kept overnight and placed on iv antibiotics and will go home on keflex.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from provider indicating the reason for generator migration is due to no suture use to secure generator in pocket during initial implant and generator pocket infection.The surgery was for patient comfort and to treat infection.The cause of the bruising is due to the presence of the vns per the provider and due to the migration of the generator to the left breast.The cause of the infection and drainage found was noted to be related to presence of vns.At surgery vns generator was seen to have moved into the region of the left breast and is painful.Vns generator was in the left breast directly underlying the areola.When opened the pocket containing generator had cloudy fluid which has a slight odor.Bloodwork was sent at end of operation to evaluate for infection as a cause of the unexpected cloudy fluid in the vns generator pocket.Vns generator revision with repositioning of the existing m1000 into a new sq pocket just below the clavicle.Prior to repositioning the generator and the existing pocket in the region of the left breast was irrigated and debrided after finding purulent fluid in the pocket.Provider irrigated both pockets with copious amount of vancomycin solution.I then debrided the left breast pocket and cauterized the granulation tissue that was present.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3.Device evaluated by manufacturer?, code 81, device evaluation is not necessary as reported event(s) are not related to the functionality or delivery of therapy of the device.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that patient¿s generator was explanted due to infection.No additional information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received that patient is having continuous drainage and there is id concern therefore remaining lead is now being explanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 1000
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
dana sprague
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2816672681
MDR Report Key14660379
MDR Text Key294872128
Report Number1644487-2022-00695
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
UDI-Device Identifier05425025750405
UDI-Public05425025750405
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/05/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/18/2022
Device Model Number1000
Device Lot Number205213
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/17/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/10/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/21/2022
10/20/2022
12/14/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/15/2022
11/14/2022
01/05/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured11/19/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-