It was reported when using the bd max¿ ct/gc/tv assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false positive result was produced.No confirmatory testing was used.The test was repeated on the bd max.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that there is a false positive.Customer is reporting discrepant results when using 442970, lot #2025616.Customer states the results was positive for gonorrhea initially, then repeated twice - the result was negative with each repeat.".
|
H.6: customer complained about discrepant results.A sample initially gave a positive n.Gonorrhoeae (gc) result with the bd max¿ ctgctv assay, but when retested twice, it tested negative.No other complaint was received on the bd max¿ ctgctv kit lot 2025616.In the last twelve months, 7 other complaints were received about false positive or discrepant results with the bd max¿ ctgctv assay.Among them, 4 were for the gc target.Most probable root causes identified were contamination of the samples and sample at the limit of detection of the assay.Based on the complaint review, no reagents issue was identified for this product.No anomaly was observed, in bhr review of bd max¿ ctgctv kit lot 2025616 which could have a link with the customer issue.Also, the kit met the release specifications and qc results were within the trends.The retain material did not need to be tested since it would not provide more information than what is available from the final qc test.A gross product contamination would have been detected by the final qc test, which is not the case.No sample was received for the investigation.Runs 1968, 1971 and 1972 were provided and manual pcr curve adjudication was performed.The analysis showed true but late amplification of the gc target in run 1968 in position a1, without anomaly.No amplification of the gc target was observed in run 1971 position a11 and run 1972 position a12.Low positive samples can occur due to low bacterial load in the specimen being at or near the limit of detection of the assay or through environmental or cross contamination introduced during the sample preparation at the customer¿s site.Nevertheless, manual curve adjudication has limitations; visual examination of pcr curves for low signal is a conservative assessment of the data.Based on the data and information provided, a specimen at or near the assay limit of detection (lod), or environmental or cross contamination, are the most likely causes to explain the customer¿s positive result in run 1968.However, bd is unable to confirm the exact cause of the issue.Nonetheless, no reagents issue is suspected.
|
It was reported when using the bd max¿ ct/gc/tv assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false positive result was produced.No confirmatory testing was used.The test was repeated on the bd max.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that there is a false positive.Customer is reporting discrepant results when using 442970, lot #2025616.Customer states the results was positive for gonorrhea initially, then repeated twice - the result was negative with each repeat.".
|