• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 442970
Device Problem False Positive Result (1227)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/17/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported when using the bd max¿ ct/gc/tv assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false positive result was produced.No confirmatory testing was used.The test was repeated on the bd max.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that there is a false positive.Customer is reporting discrepant results when using 442970, lot #2025616.Customer states the results was positive for gonorrhea initially, then repeated twice - the result was negative with each repeat.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6: customer complained about discrepant results.A sample initially gave a positive n.Gonorrhoeae (gc) result with the bd max¿ ctgctv assay, but when retested twice, it tested negative.No other complaint was received on the bd max¿ ctgctv kit lot 2025616.In the last twelve months, 7 other complaints were received about false positive or discrepant results with the bd max¿ ctgctv assay.Among them, 4 were for the gc target.Most probable root causes identified were contamination of the samples and sample at the limit of detection of the assay.Based on the complaint review, no reagents issue was identified for this product.No anomaly was observed, in bhr review of bd max¿ ctgctv kit lot 2025616 which could have a link with the customer issue.Also, the kit met the release specifications and qc results were within the trends.The retain material did not need to be tested since it would not provide more information than what is available from the final qc test.A gross product contamination would have been detected by the final qc test, which is not the case.No sample was received for the investigation.Runs 1968, 1971 and 1972 were provided and manual pcr curve adjudication was performed.The analysis showed true but late amplification of the gc target in run 1968 in position a1, without anomaly.No amplification of the gc target was observed in run 1971 position a11 and run 1972 position a12.Low positive samples can occur due to low bacterial load in the specimen being at or near the limit of detection of the assay or through environmental or cross contamination introduced during the sample preparation at the customer¿s site.Nevertheless, manual curve adjudication has limitations; visual examination of pcr curves for low signal is a conservative assessment of the data.Based on the data and information provided, a specimen at or near the assay limit of detection (lod), or environmental or cross contamination, are the most likely causes to explain the customer¿s positive result in run 1968.However, bd is unable to confirm the exact cause of the issue.Nonetheless, no reagents issue is suspected.
 
Event Description
It was reported when using the bd max¿ ct/gc/tv assay on the bd max¿ instrument a false positive result was produced.No confirmatory testing was used.The test was repeated on the bd max.There was no report of adverse patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "it was reported by the customer that there is a false positive.Customer is reporting discrepant results when using 442970, lot #2025616.Customer states the results was positive for gonorrhea initially, then repeated twice - the result was negative with each repeat.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV
Type of Device
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer (Section G)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key14681712
MDR Text Key294060208
Report Number3007420875-2022-00031
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUY
UDI-Device Identifier00382904429706
UDI-Public00382904429706
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151589
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model Number442970
Device Catalogue Number442970
Device Lot Number2025616
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/20/2022
Initial Date FDA Received06/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received06/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/25/2022
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-