As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Device not returned.
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.One electronic photo was provided for review.The photo shows an outer atlas gold packaging box with the label visible referencing catalog number lx3513061005f and lot number gfdy2537.The expiration date is listed as 2025-02-10.The dhr review results and certificate of analysis verify this is the correct expiration date for the product.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the incorrect labeling as the product labeling attached to the packaging has the correct information.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: (expiration date: 12/2022).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|