SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. UNKN R3 SHELL; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 10/07/2017 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: case-(b)(4).Teoh, k.H., whitham, r.D., golding, d.M., wong, j.F., lee, p.Y., & evans, a.R.(2018).R3 cup does not have a high failure rate in conventional bearings: a minimum of 5-year follow-up.The journal of arthroplasty, 33(2), 460-463.Doi:https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.Arth.2017.09.059.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, on the literature review "r3 cup does not have a high failure rate in conventional bearings: a minimum of 5-year follow-up", two (2) patients who initially underwent primary thr implantation with an r3 acetabular cup and a cementless polarstem, experienced a deep vein thrombosis.The measures taken to resolve this adverse event are not known.No further information is available.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The devices were not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per the complaint details, no further information is available.Consequently, without clinically relevant patient-specific supporting documentation, a thorough medical investigation could not be performed.The images provided in the article have been interpreted within the text; therefore, no further analysis of the images is required.The root cause and/or patient outcome beyond that which was documented in the article could not be confirmed nor concluded; therefore, no further medical assessment is warranted at this time.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the products failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors and/or some potential probable causes that could contribute to the reported event have been identified as overuse or excessive pressure on the joint, injury and/or patient condition.The contribution of the devices to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual products involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|