Model Number 72404127 |
Device Problems
Inflation Problem (1310); Difficult or Delayed Activation (2577)
|
Patient Problem
Urinary Incontinence (4572)
|
Event Date 06/03/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The implant date and lot number of the concomitants were unable to be obtained though good faith efforts.The data was obtained through a review of the surgical history previously provided by the physician.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient presented with recurring incontinence with an artificial urinary sphincter (aus).The existing device had worked initially, but eventually the incontinence returned.The physician attempted to cycle the device and refill the pump, but the issue was not identified and not resolved.The aus pump and balloon were explanted and replaced with a new pump and balloon.No additional patient complications were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient presented with recurring incontinence with an artificial urinary sphincter (aus).The existing device had worked initially, but eventually the incontinence returned.The physician attempted to cycle the device and refill the pump, but the issue was not identified and not resolved.The aus pump and balloon were explanted and replaced with a new pump and balloon.No additional patient complications were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The implant date and lot number of the concomitant products were unable to be obtained though good faith efforts.The data was obtained through a review of the surgical history previously provided by the physician.Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, the returned components underwent thorough analysis.The balloon was examined visually and microscopically and no damage was noted.The balloon passed leak testing but did not perform within pressure specification during functional testing.No pump issues were identified via visual or microscopic testing and the pump passed leak testing.No functional testing was performed on the pump due to the confirmed balloon pressure issue.Review of the manufacturing documentation did not find any evidence that the device failed to meet product specifications prior to shipment.The labelling review and risk review did not find any evidence that the device was handled improperly and indicated that therapy response altered and urinary incontinence are included as harms in the instructions for use.Based on all available information it was determined that the reported clinical event was the likely result of the balloon not meeting pressure specifications which would impact device efficacy as reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|