C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT SLIM IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, KIT, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 1716070J |
Device Problems
Separation Failure (2547); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/26/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The catalog number identified has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products is identified.As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.(expiration date: 04/2023).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the valve of sheath was allegedly unable to be peeled away well.It was further reported that the plastic valve was cut with scissors and used.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the powerport slim implantable port, chronoflex single-lumen, kit, 6f products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one cath-lock, one catheter, one j-tip guidewire in a guidewire hoop, one straight tip guidewire, one guidewire hoop, one fully peeled 6.5fr peel-apart sheath, one vessel dilator and one dilator loaded to a 5f sheath were returned for evaluation.Gross visual evaluation were performed.The investigation is confirmed for the reported difficulty in peeling the introducer sheath and identified deformation and improper valve separation issue as the fully peeled sheath was noted to have twisting and kinks throughout both segments.Further, the airguard valve did not break properly in the middle.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: d4 (expiration date: 04/2023), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : see h10.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a port placement procedure, the valve of sheath was allegedly unable to be peeled away well.It was further reported that the plastic valve was cut with scissors and used.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|