A visual, dimensional, and functional inspection were performed on the returned device.The reported device dislodge or dislocated was confirmed.The reported difficult to advance could not be tested as it was based on operational context.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|