Model Number GIF-H190 |
Device Problem
Partial Blockage (1065)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device referenced in this report has not yet been evaluated by olympus, although it is anticipated.The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or receipt of additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reports an evis exera iii gastrointestinal videoscope was recently returned from repair (around two weeks prior).During first use, the customer noticed difficulty in advancing accessories during polypectomy.A manual brushing was performed, and an obstruction was found approximately 1 cm from suction channel.There was difficulty in advancing brush from distal end noted.Negative manual seal test.Sequence of events as follows: during a colonoscopy procedure with polypectomy, after a cold removal of a polyp removed with a loop, it was necessary to place a metal clip.The device (clip) did not come out of the instrument (scope).The instrument was tested before use where no problems were found.The procedure was completed with a delay of about 10 minutes, using the same instrument and replacing the device with a similar one but with little result.The device did not come out of the instrument, the doctor opted not to apply the clips with the potential risk of bleeding of the polyp.There were no injuries to the operators.The application of metal clips after cold loop polypectomy is not performed routinely.It depends on various factors, including the patient's current therapy, site of the polypectomy, and size.The placement of clips was decided as a primary prophylactic treatment for this patient.No post-operative bleeding occurred.There were no additional consequences to the patient reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being updated to provide investigation findings.Physical evaluation of the returned device: the user's report of blocked channel was not confirmed.- due to a crack on grip, water tightness was lost - there was a gap between control section and s-cover - switch box had a scratch - c-cover was deformed - objective lens had a scratch - universal cord had a scratch - the scope was tested with 3 different brushes and no obstruction was found.The following repair was performed in the past year.On mar.9, 2022: failure in angulation range, squeezed insertion tube, cracks on ob-lens, and so on were found.Repair was performed.On may 26, 2022: failure in angulation range, squeezed insertion tube, cracks on ob-lens, and so on were found.Repair was performed.We confirmed via device history record (dhr) review that the device satisfied the design and safety specifications when it was shipped.Conclusion: we were not able to specify the root cause.Consideration: the cause of the event could not be specified from the following investigation results.There was no feeling of blockage in channel of the subject device during olympus inspection.¿the scope was tested with 3 different brushes and no obstruction was found.¿ the user attempted to insert 2 boston scientific resolution 360 clips, however both of them could not be inserted.Used 2 resolution 360 boston scientific metal clips (none came out of the instrument).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|