• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO RESTORE ADVANCED; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO RESTORE ADVANCED; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 37713
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problems Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id 377760, lot# v015321, implanted: (b)(6) 2006, product type lead.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 377760, serial/lot #: (b)(4), ubd: 21-nov-2010, udi#: (b)(4).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient's lead was fractured and not in use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.They reported that they needed to know if they could get an mri done even though pt had a "fractured" wires in place.When the pts implantable neurostimulator (ins) was taken out it was done by their healthcare provider (hcp) and when they removed the leads one of the leads fractured and was still there.Pt said a different doctor replaced the ins and said they could not get that lead out.When pt got the removal of the ins one of the leads fractured and the doctor could not get the lead out; they "dicked" around with it.Patient saw the other doctor who put the new ins in.During the lead removal they could not get a hold of the lead for they were afraid they would paralyze the pt.The other hcp said they could not get the lead out.Pt wanted to know if the abandon lead was in them could they get an mri of their back or not, mri guidelines were reviewed.The pt had lots of medical problems and need mris; that was the main reason why they removed the original ins and leads so they cou ld get mris.The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to further address the issue.2023-dec-23: additional information was received from the patient.They called back repeating when they replaced the implant the hcp fractured the wire.The fractured wire was still in the back.Pt was told they could not have an mri.Pt mentioned they could not find an hcp who could remove the abandoned lead.Pt was concerned about the wire floating around.Pt asked for help finding an hcp.Provided hcp listings over the phone.Pt also wanted to know what the manufacturer thought of their fractured wire, if it was ok, why it was fractured, and whether other pts had this happen.Reviewed manufacturer role, redirected to hcp.Reviewed clinical summary.Reviewed if the wire gets removed, hcp can send it for analysis.Reviewed electrocautery guidelines.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESTORE ADVANCED
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key14990885
MDR Text Key304613667
Report Number3004209178-2022-08834
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/18/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2007
Device Model Number37713
Device Catalogue Number37713
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/08/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/23/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/18/2024
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-