Per the clinic, the patient was placed under general anesthesia on (b)(6) 2022 in order to perform a skin revision surgery and the device was explanted.The reported adverse event is associated with a returned device; however, the provided clinical information was reviewed by the manufacturer and no specific device analysis is deemed necessary at this time.Previous product examinations have not showed any relationship between a product geometrical deviation and the reported clinical complication.Additionally, there are no indications that a product failure has contributed to the reported issue.Skin breakdown or necrosis at the magnet site can occur with usage of a too strong magnet or/in combination with too long daily usage periods of the sp.The patient often has numbness at the implant site after surgery which can explain why the recipient does not feel that skin becomes irritated.Issues can often be resolved through equipment troubleshooting e.G.Changing to a weaker magnet and/or use the sound processor magnet with a softwear pad.There are six different magnet sizes/strengths available.(#1 being the weakest, #6 being the strongest).This report is submitted on august 23, 2022.
|