The company service representative, examined the system.And confirmed, the reported system message (sm) in the system event log.However, the company service representative, was unable to replicate the sm, while on-site.As a preventative measure, the company service representative, provided field service test cassette paks to the customer.The system was then tested and met all product specifications.The company service representative, inspected the system for the priming error, but was not aware of the reported laser issue, while onsite.It was learned, that the interlock had been disconnected and unplugged by the staff.The interlock was plugged back in by another technician and proper training to the staff was addressed.The customer cancelled, the request for the laser issue.And there was no further service visit.As of september 27, 2022, the customer has not reported of any further laser issue.A system non-conformance-based review of the batch/lot/serial number was performed and did not reveal, any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed, prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this lot/batch/serial number was performed.A potentially relevant complaint was found and reviewed as part of this investigation.The complaint was opened to address a lamp illumination issue, tray arm issue, priming issue, and rfid issue.The complaint is in progress at the time of this investigation.The root cause cannot be determined conclusively.Manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|