• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number OER-5
Device Problem Device Handling Problem (3265)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
There are four automatic endoscopy reprocessors (aers) at the facility impacted.There are also four water filters, one for each aer, associated with this event.As reported for this event by the facility, the water supply lines to the device were disinfected on the day the acecide disinfectant of the device was changed.The normal usage for of the acecide disinfectant for the facility was 27 times before the acecide was required to be changed.The facility did not do a check for the disinfectant concentration at every use of the device as recommended by the instructions for use.However, a disinfectant concentration check was performed for one of the aer devices the day after the disinfection of the water supply line, though the 27 uses were not completed, and the device failed the concentration test.There is a possibility that a scope was reprocessed with reduced concentration of acecide disinfectant and used.In addition, it was found that this was the first time the facility disinfected the water supply line since the aer devices were delivered approximately eight months before the event; the water filters of all four aers also had not been replaced since the first use of the device.The facility does not have any incident of harm reported to any patient or persons.The facility has now been made aware that the acecide concentration check needs to be performed for every use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Full name of the facility is (b)(6) hospital.There are total 9 devices associated with this event (four automatic endoscopy reprocessors (aers), four water filters, and one unknown scope).These devices are captured in medwatches with patient identifiers as below: patient identifier model # serial # (b)(6), oer-5 (aer) (b)(4).(b)(6), oer-5 (aer) (b)(4).(b)(6), oer-6 (aer) (b)(4).(b)(6), oer-6 (aer) (b)(4).(b)(6), maj-2317 (water filter) (b)(6), maj-2317 (water filter) (b)(6), maj-2317(water filter) (b)(6), maj-2317 (water filter) (b)(6), cf-h290i representing the unknown scope this medwatch is for the patient identifier (b)(6).This device is not sold in the us but a similar device is.The device is not returned, as such a definitive root cause of the reported complaint cannot be determined at this time.This event is under investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or upon receiving additional information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the approved final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.Based on the results of the investigation, the definitive root cause of the water supply piping disinfection failure could not be determined.It is possible that the water utilized for rinsing was not effective as a filter.The decrease in disinfectant may have been caused by: 1: the disinfectant was gradually being discharged during the disinfecting process, due to temporary failure of the drain valve or the foreign material jammed.2: the disinfectant volume sampled was large when check the concentration of the disinfectant, and the volume had largely been decreasing at every check.3: there was a gap between the top cover packing and the cleaning tank, from which the disinfectant went around to the back side of the packing, and it could not be completely recovered during the recovering process, it gradually resulted in decrease.4: as the liquid leakage occurred in the device, the disinfectant amount had gradually been decreasing.5: the disinfectant was discharged due to any other factors.The instruction manual identifies the following verbiage, which may have prevented the phenomenon: ¿chapter 7 routine maintenance 7.3 disinfecting the water supply piping disinfection of water supply piping is required in the following cases: ¿ before using this equipment for the first time (after installation of the water filter set) ¿ immediately after replacement of the water filter ¿ whenever bacteria are identified in the water supply piping ¿ before using the equipment when it has not been used for more than 14 days the acecide disinfectant solution stored in the equipment is used for disinfection of the water supply piping.¿ olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR
Type of Device
ENDOSCOPE REPROCESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8-520
JA   965-8520
426422891
MDR Report Key15115610
MDR Text Key304712339
Report Number9610595-2022-00347
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FEB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberOER-5
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/05/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/27/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/30/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2021
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-