(b)(4).The returned device was visually inspected.No evidence of any damage or defect was observed on the shaft or tip of the device.No fogging or condensation was noted on or in the lens.Witness marks were observed on the pads of the umbilicus connector, indicating it was connected to a controller.It was noted that the image capture button was detached from the scope handle.An image assessment was performed by connecting the device to an exalt controller.Upon connection, a live image was displayed.No issues were observed with the image.Articulation of the tip was performed using the control knobs on the handle, and no changes to the image quality were observed.The tip was manually manipulated, and no issues were observed with the image.The umbilicus was manipulated by rotating the connector at the controller, applying tension to the cable, and stressing the strain reliefs at the connector and the handle; no issues were observed with the image.The handle was opened to visually inspect the repeated button printed circuit board assembly (pcba) at the top of the handle, and the grounding components in the bottom of the handle.No visual defects were identified.The event was not confirmed.Product analysis was unable to replicate the failure or identify any issue that could have caused or contributed the reported event; no probable cause could be identified.In addition to potential device issues, factors external to the returned device, such as issues with the customer setup, could have contributed to the reported event.Based on all gathered information, the conclusion code selected for this event is no problem detected, which indicates that the event could not be confirmed after analysis of the returned device.A review of the manufacturing documentation for this device revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label.
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an exalt model d single-use duodenoscope was used during an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.During the procedure, as the physician was intubating the stomach using an exalt scope, the image was lost.As the nurse and physician prepared to remove and exchange the scope, the image returned.However, they still switched to another exalt scope.The procedure was completed with the second exalt scope.There were no patient complications as a result of this event.
|