• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. CYSTO-NEPHRO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD. CYSTO-NEPHRO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number CYF-VHA
Device Problem Contamination (1120)
Patient Problems Fever (1858); Pain (1994); Urinary Tract Infection (2120); Chills (2191); Urinary Frequency (2275)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer reports over the last 1-2 months, a cluster of five patients have been infected with urinary tract infections after endoscopy using one of two cystoscopes that were processed in an oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient 1 of 5 -scope (cyf-vha).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient 2 of 5 -scope (cyf-vha).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient 3 of 5 -scope (cyf-vha).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient 4 of 5- scope (cyf-vha).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient 5 of 5- scope (cyf-vha).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports second scope processed in the oer-s (cyf-va2).(potential for cross contamination).Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient infection 1 of 5 potentially related to oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient infection 2 of 5 potentially related to oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient infection 3 of 5 potentially related to oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient infection 4 of 5 potentially related to oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports patient infection 5 of 5 potentially related to oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports potential cross contamination of cyf-va2 by oer-s.Case with patient identifier (b)(6) reports the maj-891 used by the ore-s for the reprocessor.More than a year ago, there was something like green algae growing on the water filter.In view of this, the facility is concerned about infection caused by oer-s.At that time, the facility staff did not find any abnormalities after the response, so the process was completed without any problems, and there was no problem with the frequency of filter replacement at the facility noted.Microbiological investigation of the reported reprocessor indicates the oer-s is not the source of infection in the reported patients.Additional details regarding the patients and reported events have been requested.At this time, no additional information has been provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device referenced in this report has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The definitive cause of the user¿s experience cannot be determined at this time.The investigation is ongoing.This report will be updated upon completion of the investigation or upon receipt of additional relevant information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been almost 8 years since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the customer performed a culture test on the scopes cyf-va2 and cyf-vha, but bacterial growth was not confirmed.Therefore, the root cause could not be determined.The event can be detected/prevented by following the instructions for use (ifu) which state: ¿warning: an insufficiently reprocessed endoscope and/or accessory may pose an infection control risk to the patients and/or operators who contact them.¿ this supplemental report includes information added to b5, d4, d8, g2 and h4.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Event Description
The following additional information regarding the reported event was received: all five patients experienced fever, chills, pain when urinating, and frequent urination.The patients were prescribed antibiotics at the time of the endoscopy.Although the patients were hospitalized for fever, upon re-examination, the patients recovered and reported to be in good condition.The physician suspects the possibility of olympic equipment contributing to the infections due to the large number of patients returning with almost identical symptoms approximately ten days after each endoscopic procedure.There were no additional instruments used during the procedures.Although, additional information regarding the patients and the occurrence of disease were requested, no additional information was obtained.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CYSTO-NEPHRO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
CYSTO-NEPHRO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHIRAKAWA OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8 061
JA  961-8061
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
3-1 okamiyama
odakura, nishigo-mura,
nishishirakawa-gun, fukushima 961-8-061
JA   961-8061
426422891
MDR Report Key15124224
MDR Text Key296842543
Report Number3002808148-2022-00419
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAJ
UDI-Device Identifier04953170411274
UDI-Public4953170411274
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K062049
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberCYF-VHA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/29/2022
Initial Date FDA Received07/28/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/13/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/31/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-