SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ANTHOLOGY HIP IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/CERAMIC/METAL, CEMENTED OR UNCE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number UNKNOWN |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Unspecified Infection (1930); Infiltration into Tissue (1931); Metal Related Pathology (4530)
|
Event Date 11/01/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the plaintiff underwent a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 due to a left hip periprosthetic joint infection.The revision surgery consisted in: 1) the explantation of the bhr-tha system and placement of an articulating antibiotic spacer with acetabular and femoral components.2) irrigation and debridement procedure of the left hip skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, and bone.3) left hip proximal femur and extended trochanteric osteotomy.During the revision surgery, purulence was seen, as well as trunnion corrosion.The patient tolerated the procedure well.This patient had a previous left hip implant infection in (b)(6) 2021, which was treated with an irrigation and debridement procedure and iv antibiotic therapy.The primary left hip bhr tha procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2010.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Section h3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation and the reported event could not be confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, patient had a left tha (b)(6) 2010 and a left revision 11.5 years post implantation.The surgical indications for the revision were noted as recurrence of infection with a draining sinus.The initial infection was noted to have occurred (b)(6) 2021, at that time he was treated with irrigation and debridement¿s and was placed on iv antibiotics.Four months later he had a revision with explantation of implants and placement of articulating antibiotic spacer with acetabular and femoral components.The revision operative findings were, ¿a draining sinus over the left hip that tracked to the deep hip joint where purulence was seen, well-fixed components with bony ingrowth along the entire length of the femoral stem down to the tip, and deficiency of the posterior acetabular wall.Trunnion corrosion was seen; however, there did not appear to be significant adverse local tissue reaction.¿ post operative planning included ¿long-term iv antibiotics, likely 6-8 weeks, and additional oral antibiotic course.We will plan for second-stage reimplantation in the future once it appears that the infection has been eradicated.¿ no documents have been provided regarding the planned second stage of the revision.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Possible causes could include but are not limited to contamination, patient reaction, and post-operative healing issue.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H6: health effect - clinical code and health effect - impact code.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|