H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation but according to the clinical/medical investigation the three photos and x-ray were reviewed, and the pre-operative x-ray shows the plate and cables as well as confirms the reported femoral fracture.The femoral fracture, subsidence, and subsequent revision were reported to have been a result of the patient¿s fall.It cannot be concluded that the reported events were a result of a malperformance of the implant.The patient impact beyond the revision cannot be determined.However, it was noted, ¿the new redapt stem and head placed without issue.A review of complaint history for the previous 12 months did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for hip systems revealed that implant migration or subsidence has been identified as an intraoperative warning and precaution.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors and/or potential causes that could contribute to the reported event include patient bone quality and/or traumatic injury.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|