• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS GS; ANESTHESIA UNITS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA FABIUS GS; ANESTHESIA UNITS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8604700
Device Problems Device Reprocessing Problem (1091); Gas Output Problem (1266); Failure to Deliver (2338)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/22/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A dräger service technician tested the device after the reported event without any deviation to specification.The elctronic log file was downloaded and submitted for analyses.Based on the information stored therein the case in question could be reconstructed.The log entries indicate, that a combination of a fresh gas deficit with an improperly opening auxiliary air intake valve led to the oberved ventilator failure.During downward movement of the piston the device detected that a negative pressure has been built-up to a certain level which is an indication for a fresh gas deficit.Such freh gas deficit can be caused by an unsuitable freh gas setting and/ or leakages in the patient circuit.The log entries do not allow for a more detailed analysis regading the exact root cause.However the provide evidence that the last leak test was perforemed on june 14.8 days prior to the reported event.This is against the instructions for use which advise the user to perform a leak test on a daily basis.The fabius is designed to open an auxiliary air intake valve on top of the ventilator to compensate the fresh gas deficit with ambient air.According to the log the compenstation did not happen as expected which indicates the the movement of the auxiliary air intake valve was restricted.The negative pressure further increased and the fabius finally reacted as specified by temporarily stopping the piston movement and generating a ventialtor failure alarm.In such case ventilation will resume automatically once the pressure is within the accepted range.Against the background of the technician's test results, it can be concluded there was no persistant device failure.Based on all availeble information it is seen likely that humidity has led to sticking or delayed opening of the valve.Based on experience this is caused by insufficient reprocessing (in particular drying).Traces can hardly be determined afterwards as the humidity will likely evaporate quickly.The fabius reacted as specified for this scenario.The number of similar cases is within the expected range of the respective risk assessment and thus accepted.
 
Event Description
It was reported during a case he unit displayed a ventilator failure.There was no patient injury reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FABIUS GS
Type of Device
ANESTHESIA UNITS
Manufacturer (Section D)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
DRÄGERWERK AG & CO. KGAA
moislinger allee 53-55
lübeck 23542
GM   23542
MDR Report Key15144664
MDR Text Key304193948
Report Number9611500-2022-00187
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BSZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K011404
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/02/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number8604700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/06/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/02/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/30/2006
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-