• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV; TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 442970
Device Problem Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/18/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medical device expiration date: unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown.A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ ct/gc/tv, that there were discrepant tv results from the same patient.This is a report for a single occurrence.There were no false results reported out to the patient or the clinician.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reports that they performed both the ct/gc/tv panel and vaginal panel for the same patients and the tv results were different between the two assays.Per customer, they had at least 6 instances where patient samples were collected for both vaginal panel and ct/gc/tv and upon testing, the tv result was positive for the vaginal panel but negative for the ct/gc/tv assay.All ct/gc/tv tests were done using ct2310.The vaginal panel tests were done using ct1321.Discussed the possibility of lod and specimen collection affecting results.Customer will collected specimen information like run number and position.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: new information has been received regarding mfr.Report # 1119779-2022-01065 indicating the discrepant tv was an instrument normalization issue, not a reagent issue making it not reportable.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ ct/gc/tv, that there were discrepant tv results from the same patient.This is a report for a single occurrence.There were no false results reported out to the patient or the clinician.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reports that they performed both the ct/gc/tv panel and vaginal panel for the same patients and the tv results were different between the two assays.Per customer, they had at least 6 instances where patient samples were collected for both vaginal panel and ct/gc/tv and upon testing, the tv result was positive for the vaginal panel but negative for the ct/gc/tv assay.All ct/gc/tv tests were done using ct2310.The vaginal panel tests were done using ct1321.Discussed the possibility of lod and specimen collection affecting results.Customer will collected specimen information like run number and position.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ CT/GC/TV
Type of Device
TRICHOMONAS VAGINALIS NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TEST SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key15166796
MDR Text Key305048643
Report Number1119779-2022-01065
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OUY
UDI-Device Identifier00382904429706
UDI-Public382904429706
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K151589
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Catalogue Number442970
Device Lot NumberUNKOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/18/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/04/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/23/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-