BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC DECANAV ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER; CATHETER, ELECTRODE RECORDING, OR PROBE, ELECTRODE RECORDING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number R7D282CT |
Device Problem
Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
|
Patient Problem
Cardiac Tamponade (2226)
|
Event Date 07/13/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been reported as discarded, therefore no product investigation can be performed, and the customer complaint cannot be confirmed.Manufacturer record evaluation cannot be conducted because the no lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc.Or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a 65-year-old female patient (overweight) underwent an idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (idvt) ablation procedure decanav electrophysiology catheter.The patient had a cardiac tamponade requiring surgical drainage and prolonged hospitalization.During an idvt case on wednesday, after going up with ultrasound and taking a number of contours, a baseline effusion was observed.They continued by placing the cs (coronary sinus) catheter to star mapping and noticed that the effusion had gotten larger shortly into the case, and the physician began to reverse with protamine.They monitored the effusion to see if it would continue to grow; the effusion did not continue to grow and pull the catheter and continued to monitor with ultrasound.The first catheter in was the ultrasound catheter, and the last catheter out was also the ultrasound catheter.Transthoracic echo was also used to monitor.As soon as the effusion was noticed, they stopped the case and began reverting to using protamine.The patient is in stable condition.The deca nav catheter is speculated to have caused a micro tear when it was placed, but under monitoring, there was no proof that a tear was made.The physician does not suspect that anything is wrong with the product and believes it was more weakness of the vascular tissue of the patient.Using the color doppler from ultrasound which shows the flow of fluid did not show any abnormality but did not show anything.Everything appeared to be normal.The physician believes this was a result of patient condition.Intervention consisted of protamine administration and monitoring on ultrasound.I was informed today (b)(6) 2022 by the physician that after the patient was moved to icu, effusion was observed to have grown.Effusion was then surgically drained.Patient is fully recovered.The patient required extended hospitalization because of the adverse event.The patient was kept 5 nights for observation and discharged (b)(6) 2022.The generator used in the case was a smartablate generator.Transeptal was performed with the baylis nrg.No ablation was performed.The event occurred during mapping phase.No irrigated or contact force catheters put in the body.Since the event is life threatening and it might result in permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure; or it could require medical or surgical intervention to prevent permanent impairment of a body function or permanent damage to a body structure, it is to be considered serious and mdr-reportable.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|