Upon investigation with the facility it was determined that rules (user facility programmed logic) were functioning as expected but the programming of those rules was not in alignment with the expectation of the facility.For example, rules were programmed to look for specific error codes to run dilutions.In instances where those error codes were present with the test results the rules were functioning as expected by the facility.While the rule was functioning as expected, when the error code was not present the dilutions were not being run; this was not the intent of the facility.Because the rules were functioning as programmed this is not a malfunction of the system.Data innovations has suggested to the facility that a review of all rules within the system be completed to ensure that they are all programmed correctly to achieve the results desired by the facility.While this is not a malfunction of the insturment manager medical device (rules were working as programmed) it is being reported due to the facilities inability to provide a patient impact of the user error.
|