(b)(4).The following information was requested, but unavailable:
- how was the product purchased?
- is there an indication of how the product was distributed?
- is there any indication of the source?
- based on the packaging, is there any indication of which market the original genuine product may have come from?
- was the device used on a patient? if so, was there any patient consequence?
photo investigation summary: the packaging was observed to be according to the process specifications and the product was manufactured by ethicon, the diversion product is confirmed, since the ethicon product was not distributed by affiliate authorized.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.In a further investigation of the samples received, it was observed, that there was excessive carton damage and the artwork on the pouch and carton had added spacing mistakes.There were shading discrepancies on the carton when compared to approved artwork.The inside foil pouch appearance appears shinier than approved material appearance.In addition, it was noted time-stamp was identical for all packages of the same line.Based on the information currently available, counterfeit was identified during the investigation of the samples received.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|