Model Number DIB00 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Zonular Dehiscence (2698)
|
Event Date 08/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the customer put the intraocular lens (iol)in the patient's left eye but patient's eye would not hold it.They had to cut the iol in half to take it out and replaced it with a non johnson and johnson iol.It was learned that during the procedure there was a capsular weakness which lead to a posterior capsular tear.However, the customer did not think that there was a product quality issue.There was no incision enlargement, no vitrectomy or sutures done.The patient left without problems.No other information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Unknown/ not provided.If implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was not implanted if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was not implanted hence not removed.Other: the device is not returned; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrected data; upon further review it was noted that device code of 1316 (difficult to insert) is not accurate.Rather it should be 2993 (adverse event without identified device or use problem).Also, 2698 (2698 - zonular dehiscence) is added to h6: health effect - clinical code.Additional information: section d9.Device available for evaluation?: yes.Returned to manufacturer on: sep.8, 2022.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer?: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received stuck to a plastic tray.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and, no issues that could contribute to complaint report were identified.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|