• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; FOGARTY EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER; FOGARTY EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 120404FP
Device Problems Material Fragmentation (1261); Inflation Problem (1310)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/17/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, it is not possible to determine if damages or defects exist on the product, nor can any manufacturing nonconformance, failure mode, root cause, or potential contributing factors be identified.A device history record review and engineering evaluation have been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Event Description
Per medwatch report mw511051, during a left thigh exploratory surgery for ballistic wound trauma, there were four fogarty arterial embolectomy catheters that were tested on the sterile field and would not maintain balloon inflation.The fifth catheter was used successfully.Upon follow-up with the facility, it was learned that the patient lost a total of 3000 ml of blood and was transfused with 2450 ml of fluid/blood products.The reporter stated that the delay of use of the embolectomy catheter was not a contributing factor in the blood loss.The catheters will not be returned for evaluation as they were discarded.The patient recovered.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our product evaluation lab received one model 120404f embolectomy catheter.The balloon latex appeared deteriorated with multiple cracks and tears evident.Leakage was observed through the tears on the balloon.Both balloon windings were intact.The balloon latex was released from the proximal windings to check the balloon edges at the tears, which did not appear to match.Latex deterioration is a condition usually caused by age, excessive exposure to light, atmosphere, or ozone.Appears on the balloon surface as a maze of fine cracks or crazing.The condition may occur in a small area or cover the entire balloon.No other visible damage was observed from the catheter body.A device history record review was completed and documented that the device met all specifications upon distribution.The customer report of a balloon issue was confirmed on evaluation.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An engineering evaluation was initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.As part of the manufacturing process controls, 100 percent of the units go through a balloon winding and visual inspection.The units should not have bends, wrinkles, cuts, contamination, stains, deterioration, discoloration, or ripples.The storage conditions for these catheters are specified in the ifu.A product risk assessment addresses balloons with fragmentations for embolectomy catheters, and a capa to address this issue is currently in its implementation phase.The capa investigation concluded that the root cause is exposure of latex to ozone, which can happen when the pouch packaged device is stored in rooms with high energy ionizing radiation sources that could generate ozone e.G.Fluoroscopy machines, x ray machines, uv lights, hvac sanitation equipment, etc.As a result, fca 90905 was voluntarily initiated instructing customers to return any product which has been stored in the same room as high energy ionizing radiation sources which emit ozone.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FOGARTY ARTERIAL EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Type of Device
FOGARTY EMBOLECTOMY CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES, PR
state rd indus pk 402 km 1.4
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492503939
MDR Report Key15311828
MDR Text Key304194991
Report Number2015691-2022-07570
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103205107
UDI-Public(01)00690103205107(17)230531(11)210301(10)63669374
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PREAMENDMEN
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2023
Device Model Number120404FP
Device Catalogue Number120404FP
Device Lot Number63669374
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/02/2022
Initial Date FDA Received08/29/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/07/2022
10/13/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/20/2022
10/13/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight67 KG
-
-