The patient had a tracheostomy tube size 8 inserted without difficulty.Eight days later at 1111, the rn noticed an audible leak coming from the patient's tracheostomy.The patient began to experience decreasing oxygen saturations requiring an increase in oxygen.The respiratory therapist and rn assessed the patient and recommended increasing the peep from 10 to 12 cm h20.It was determined the cuff was not holding air and the physician replaced the tracheostomy with the same style of tube and size.At 1500, the rn began hearing a leak from the tracheostomy, and cuff pressure was measured by rt.The rt replaced some air due to cuff pressure being below the previous measurement.By 2130, the patient was being placed back in bed and rn documented that the cuff "popped".The tracheostomy was replaced by the physician for the 2nd time.Several days later, at 0830, the tracheostomy was replaced due to a persistent leak.It was noted the 3rd tracheostomy did not have the same lot number as replacement tracheostomy #1 and #2.The 3rd tracheostomy remains in place without any issues.The patient did not have any anatomical malformation of the airway.The manufacturer sent questions regarding the incident and the product to be completed.They would like to have the products sent back to them for analysis team review.
|