|
Model Number G56174 |
Device Problems
Flaked (1246); Material Separation (1562)
|
Patient Problems
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.Occupation = "mso ir." pma/510(k) number = unavailable as the device lot number, rpn, and gpn are unknown.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported, the hydrophilic coating came off of "several" (unspecified number) roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guides.Additional information has been requested.
|
|
Event Description
|
Information was available and inadvertently omitted from the initial report.No portion of the device remained in the patient's body.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received 21sep2022.After the wires were flushed, they became stuck as they were advanced through unspecified catheters.This occurred during multiple procedures, both during use and during preparation of the device.The wires were not altered prior to use.Non-latex gloves were worn and the coating was activated by flushing with either saline or heparinized saline.The duration of hydrophilic coating activation was case-dependent.The wires were kept hydrated when not in use and the coating was reactivated prior to re-use.A white residue was reportedly coming off of the wires.No tortuosity, calcification, or scarring was noted during the cases.There were no adverse effects to any patient, and no additional procedures were needed.
|
|
Event Description
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, the hydrophilic coating came off of "several" (unspecified number) roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guides.No portion of the device remained in the patient's body.Additional information was received (b)(6) 2022.After the wires were flushed, they became stuck as they were advanced through unspecified catheters.This occurred during multiple procedures, both during use and during preparation of the device.The wires were not altered prior to use.Non-latex gloves were worn and the coating was activated by flushing with either saline or heparinized saline.The duration of hydrophilic coating activation was case-dependent.The wires were kept hydrated when not in use and the coating was reactivated prior to re-use.A white residue was reportedly coming off of the wires.No tortuosity, calcification, or scarring was noted during the cases.There were no adverse effects to any patient, and no additional procedures were needed.Corrected information: h6 (annex a) investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, quality control procedures and specifications were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection and functional test of the returned devices was also conducted.Two prior to use and eight unopened devices were returned to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned devices revealed that there was no coating coming off any of the wires.The returned wires were tested by activating the coating with water and, while using gloves, running their fingers down the whole length of the guide.All returned wires were tested and all felt lubricious.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.A review of complaint history records shows no other related complaints associated with the complaint device lot.Because there were no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in the field.The instructions for use (ifu) provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: preparation 1.Before removing the hydrophilic wire guide from its dispenser, inject sterile heparinized saline solution into the luer lock hub end of the dispenser.2.Inject enough solution to fill the dispenser coil.This will completely cover the wire guide surface and activate the hydrophilic coating.3.Remove the hydrophilic wire guide from its dispenser by gently withdrawing the wire¿s tip.4.If the hydrophilic wire guide cannot easily be removed from its dispenser, inject more heparinized saline solution into the dispenser and then try again.How supplied: upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the returned devices, complaint file, dhr, dmr, and ifu provide objective evidence to support that the device was manufactured to specification.Based on the available information, customer testimony, and results of the investigation, cook concluded that a component failure unrelated to the design or manufacturing of the complaint device caused this incident.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|