• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 0500318E
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Dyspnea (1816); Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Tachycardia (2095)
Event Date 08/08/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Fresenius received a voluntary medwatch from a user facility stating the patient experienced an allergic reaction to the fresenius optiflux 180nre dialyzer.This patient was at their first outpatient hemodialysis (hd) treatment and pre-treatment vitals were as follows: blood pressure (bp) 136/74, pulse 75, respiration 18, temperature 97.6°.The treatment was initiated at 1015 hours on a fresenius 2008t machine utilizing the optiflux 180nre dialyzer.At approximately 1020 hours the patient complained of shortness of breath.Per standing orders, the nurse applied 3l of o2 to the patient via nasal cannula.The patient¿s vitals were obtained and recorded as bp 151/82 and pulse 103.Emergency medical services (ems) was called.At the time of transport, the patient¿s bp was 154/68 and pulse 100.The patient was transported to the emergency room (er) via ems.The patient was admitted to the hospital.The following day the patient was initiated on hd therapy utilizing a rexeed dialyzer.The patient experienced the same symptoms upon initiation of hd treatment.It was then that the patient was diagnosed with a polysulfone allergy aggravated by ace inhibitor.Both the optiflux 180nre and rexeed dialyzers contain a polysulfone membrane.The patient¿s ace inhibitor was discontinued, and the patient was treated with intravenous (iv) benadryl and methylprednisolone.A dialyzer with a cellulose acetate membrane (manufacturer not provided) was utilized for the patient¿s third treatment.There was no allergic reaction.The patient was discharged and is now utilizing a nipro cellentia 17h dialyzer and has been stable without issues since returning to regularly scheduled hd treatment.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Clinical investigation: based on the available information, there is a temporal and a likely causal relationship between the fresenius optiflux 180nre dialyzer and the patient¿s reaction (characterized by shortness of breath, tachycardia, and elevated blood pressure).Although rare, hypersensitivity or anaphylactoid reactions to dialyzers are a known risk during hemodialysis.The exposure of the patient¿s blood to a foreign substance present in the extracorporeal circuit is the result of an immunoallergic response.This was further supported by the patient¿s second allergic response to another manufacturer¿s dialyzer made with the same polysulfone membrane.Once the dialyzer was switched to a cellulose acetate membrane the reactions stopped.There is no evidence of an optiflux 180nre dialyzer product deficiency or malfunction.Additionally, although the patient experienced an adverse reaction during treatment, there is no allegation of a product malfunction or deficiency related to this event.The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation: the reported complaint was not confirmed as the complaint device was not returned for manufacturer evaluation.A production records review was performed on the reported lot.An investigation of the device history records (dhr) was conducted by the manufacturer.There was no indication of product nonacceptance, deviation, non-conformance, rework, labeling or process control failure during the manufacturing process which could be associated with the reported event.The lot met all release criteria.The optiflux dialyzer instruction for use indicates the following: ¿in rare cases, thrombocytopenia or hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions to the dialyzer, or other elements in the extracorporeal circuit, may occur during hemodialysis.Hypersensitivity reactions may cause mild to severe signs and symptoms, including itching, flushing, hives, swelling, fever, leukopenia, hypotension, hypertension, shortness of breath with wheezing, arrhythmias, and/or respiratory arrest.Patients with a history of hypersensitivity reactions or patients who have a history of being highly sensitive and allergic to a variety of substances should be carefully monitored during treatment.¿ a definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached without physical examination of the actual device.Therefore, the complaint is not confirmed.
 
Event Description
Fresenius received a voluntary medwatch from a user facility stating the patient experienced an allergic reaction to the fresenius optiflux 180nre dialyzer.This patient was at their first outpatient hemodialysis (hd) treatment and pre-treatment vitals were as follows: blood pressure (bp) 136/74, pulse 75, respiration 18, temperature 97.6°.The treatment was initiated at 1015 hours on a fresenius 2008t machine utilizing the optiflux 180nre dialyzer.At approximately 1020 hours the patient complained of shortness of breath.Per standing orders, the nurse applied 3l of o2 to the patient via nasal cannula.The patient¿s vitals were obtained and recorded as bp 151/82 and pulse 103.Emergency medical services (ems) was called.At the time of transport, the patient¿s bp was 154/68 and pulse 100.The patient was transported to the emergency room (er) via ems.The patient was admitted to the hospital.The following day the patient was initiated on hd therapy utilizing a rexeed dialyzer.The patient experienced the same symptoms upon initiation of hd treatment.It was then that the patient was diagnosed with a polysulfone allergy aggravated by ace inhibitor.Both the optiflux 180nre and rexeed dialyzers contain a polysulfone membrane.The patient¿s ace inhibitor was discontinued, and the patient was treated with intravenous (iv) benadryl and methylprednisolone.A dialyzer with a cellulose acetate membrane (manufacturer not provided) was utilized for the patient¿s third treatment.There was no allergic reaction.The patient was discharged and is now utilizing a nipro cellentia 17h dialyzer and has been stable without issues since returning to regularly scheduled hd treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OPTIFLUX 180NRE DIALYZER FINISHED ASSY.
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer (Section G)
OGDEN MANUFACTURING PLANT
director, site quality
475 west 13th street
ogden UT 84404
Manufacturer Contact
jessica trujillo
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
6174175172
MDR Report Key15348912
MDR Text Key299173951
Report Number0001713747-2022-00336
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
UDI-Device Identifier00840861100156
UDI-Public00840861100156
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162488
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number0500318E
Device Catalogue Number0500318E
Device Lot Number22HU07017
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Device AgeMO
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/02/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/24/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/04/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/21/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FRESENIUS 2008T MACHINE; FRESENIUS 2008T MACHINE; FRESENIUS BLOODLINES; FRESENIUS BLOODLINES
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight84 KG
-
-