As the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Device not returned.
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: although the sample was not returned for evaluation, one electronic photo was provided for review.The photo shows an abdomen region of the patient body where the skin appeared reddish and burned out.A gel like liquid was applied over the burn area.No catheter or port body was shown on the photo.However, the exact cause of the alleged event cannot be verified from the provided photo.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fluid leak, burning and pain issues.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|