BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION VERCISE GEVIA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINSONIAN SYMPTOMS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DB-1200-S |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Depression (2361); Shaking/Tremors (2515)
|
Event Date 10/28/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient that two days after the implant procedure the tremor returned and was worse.The patient explained that the when the stimulation was turned on the tremor was better than when the stimulation was turned off.The patient could no longer feed herself, go to the bathroom independently, she was living in an assisted living home and was depressed.The physician attempted reprogramming twice a week for a year but the issue remained.The physician did not believe the device or procedure contributed to the worsening of the tremor but rather it was a result of the progression of the patient's condition.The physician revised the patient even though there was a small chance of improvement.After the revision procedure, the left replacement lead was confirmed by computed tomography (ct) to be off target so the patient was brought back to the operating room (or), later that evening, and a new lead was placed in the target location.The patient was doing well post-operatively.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: dbs-linear leads.Upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(4).Batch: 7076450.Product family: dbs-linear leads.Upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(4).Batch: 7076603.Product family: dbs-linear leads.Upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(4).Batch: 7093916.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the deep brain stimulation (dbs) patient that two days after the implant procedure the tremor returned and was worse.The patient explained that the when the stimulation was turned on the tremor was better than when the stimulation was turned off.The patient could no longer feed herself, go to the bathroom independently, she was living in an assisted living home and was depressed.The physician attempted reprogramming twice a week for a year but the issue remained.The physician did not believe the device or procedure contributed to the worsening of the tremor but rather it was a result of the progression of the patient's condition.The physician revised the patient even though there was a small chance of improvement.After the revision procedure, the left replacement lead was confirmed by computed tomography (ct) to be off target so the patient was brought back to the operating room (or), later that evening, and a new lead was placed in the target location.The patient was doing well post-operatively.The explanted leads were discarded by the facility.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: dbs-linear leads.Upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: 7076450.Product family: dbs-linear leads upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: 7076603.Product family: dbs-linear leads.Upn: m365db2202450.Model: db-2202-45.Serial: (b)(6).Batch: 7093916.Correction to the initial mdr in field b5.The explanted leads were not returned as they were discarded by the facility.Analysis of the returned ipg indicated that the ipg passed all tests performed.However, the device exhibited an electrocautery burn mark on the front face of the case.The damage resulted from the explant procedure and is not considered a failure.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu) product label.Additionally, the ifu states that worsening of disease symptoms, potentially caused by loss of stimulation, medication changes, surgery or illness are known risks with the use of dbs.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|