EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES ENDORETURN ARTERIAL CANNULA; CATHETER, CANNULA AND TUBING, VASCULAR, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number ER21B |
Device Problems
Difficult to Insert (1316); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 08/18/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that after cannulating the femoral artery with the er21b a test dose was performed.High line pressures of the arterial cannula was observed.An echo exam was performed showing a dissection of the descending aorta.They stopped the cannulation process and decannulated once it was determined it was safe to do so.The surgeon complained that the transition from the obturator to cannula is not smooth causing a concern for dissection.The patient did not have any further complication related to the arterial dissection.As reported, the team performed a cutdown on the right common femoral artery, placed pursestring, needle, wire visualized on tee free on descending thoracic aorta and then seldinger technique.There was minimal vessel tortuosity.The incident occurred pre-bypass.The rep thinks probably the wire and dilators from the biomedicus venous cannula were used.Only tee was used during advancement and positioning.The dissection occurred on iliac artery.No repair was required.No blood loss was noted.The patient has no history of pvd.The transition from the obturator to cannula was easy, however, the dissection was a surprise.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Typically when using the endoreturn catheter, the obturator is passed through the cannula with minimum resistance.In this case the transition from the obturator to cannula was not smooth.The patient developed a descending aortic dissection during endoreturn cannulation.The device was not returned for evaluation, as it is unavailable.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the information available, the complaint is unable to be confirmed and a definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient and/or procedural factors may have contributed.The device history record (dhr) was not able to be reviewed as the device serial number was not provided.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|