• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: APIFIX LTD. MID-C 105; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

APIFIX LTD. MID-C 105; POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MID-C 105
Device Problem Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/16/2002
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the device history record confirmed that the device was manufactured and tested according to relevant procedures, and shipped according to manufacturer's specifications.Patient #(b)(6), pas # (b)(6), index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2021.X-rays from (b)(6) 2021 (4 weeks post-op) demonstrated that the extender kite angle was at more than 35° which is not within the described surgical technique.Reference dms-5449 rev g2 (surgical technique, page 21, step 26) "the extender angle should be between 5°-15° degrees compared to the mid-c rod." on (b)(6) 2022, during the company's monitoring visit, the following information was captured: "radiograph taken of his spine in pa view shows excellent correction of his spine.However, there is increased angulation between the device and the screws.This is unfortunate position that his implants have migrated significantly.At this point, i do believe we need to move forward with revising his implant in order to reposition it better.This will put less stress on the implant and cause lesser chance of implant breakage".On (b)(6) 2022, the patient was revised due to 'device migration; the kite angle increased since initial implant'.During the revision "the second vertebra screw was removed and upsized to a larger screw.  the 1st vertebra screw remained in place.  the distal screw remained in place.  the original mid-c was explanted and replaced with a new longer mid-c device." post-revision x-rays have not yet been provided.The company's incident rate of extender misalignment is (b)(4).The risk of "extender and mid-c system not properly aligned" has been assessed and found to be acceptable.
 
Event Description
Patient #(b)(6) index procedure was performed on (b)(6) 2021.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient was revised due to device migration; the kite angle had increased since initial implant.During the revision, "the second vertebra screw was removed and upsized to a larger screw.The 1st vertebra screw remained in place.The distal screw remained in place.The original mid-c was explanted and replaced with a new longer mid-c device.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Return analysis: the explanted device was returned to orthopediatrics in (b)(6) and was subjected to cleaning, steam sterilizing, and engineering evaluation.No visible wear was observed on the spherical rings.There were no obvious manufacturing or design defects which contributed to the failure.The wear analysis portion of retrieval and analysis protocol was not conducted because the cause of failure was obviously related to loss of correction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MID-C 105
Type of Device
POSTERIOR RATCHETING ROD SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS  2069207
Manufacturer (Section G)
APIFIX LTD.
1 hacarmel street
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam elit, 20692 07
IS   2069207
Manufacturer Contact
alan vaisman
1 hacarmel st.
kochav yokneam bldg
yokneam ellit, 20692-07
IS   2069207
MDR Report Key15408563
MDR Text Key306210226
Report Number3013461531-2022-00044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code QGP
UDI-Device Identifier07290018128022
UDI-Public07290018128022
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H170001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMID-C 105
Device Catalogue NumberMUS-105-040
Device Lot NumberAF-02-003-20
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/17/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/13/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/11/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-