• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD RESONANCE STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD RESONANCE STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Off-Label Use (1494)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Stainer, 2017, rms and the use of cook resonance metallic ureteral stent in cases of obstructive uropathy from persistent neoureteral stenosis, following kidney transplantation.Case 2 a 44-year-old lady underwent an uneventful cadaveric renal transplantation but postoperatively developed obstructive nephropathy requiring nephrostomy insertion, a laparotomy, and ureteral reimplantation.She experienced problems with a recurrent ureteral stricture requiring long-term management with double-j stenting.Subsequently, she underwent stent exchange to the 12 cm 6f cook resonance metallic stent at our center (operating time 50 minutes and radiation exposure 1563 cgy cm2.She has had a subsequent stent exchange with a significantly reduced operating time to 1 minutes (38% reduction), with a radiation exposure of 930 cgy cm2 (41% reduction).This dramatic reduction in operation time and radiation exposure is likely to plateau off with subsequent stent changes as after the initial insertion, the technique that works for that patient would hopefully be identified.No clinicoradiologic complications or stent-related symptoms have occurred in follow-up.The current management plan is to exchange the metallic stent on a yearly basis as recommended by the manufacturer.No adverse effects reported as occurring.Off-label use for non extrinsic source of obstruction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the unknown device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.This complaint was raised from literature article stainer et al 2017 ¿rms and the use of cook resonance metallic ureteral stent in cases of obstructive uropathy from persistent neoureteral stenosis, following kidney transplantation.¿.Lab evaluation: the device evaluation could not be completed as the device or photographic evidence of the device was not returned for evaluation.Document review: manufacturing records review could not be completed as the lot number is unknown.However, prior to distribution all rms devices are subject to visual a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.Review of historical data: historical data was not reviewed as the lot number is unknown.It should be noted that the instructions for use, ifu0020, states the following: ¿intended use: used for temporary stenting of the ureter in adult patients with extrinsic ureteral obstruction.¿.There is evidence to suggest that the customer did not follow the instructions for use.Image review: an image was not returned for evaluation.Root cause review: definitive root cause of off label use can be concluded based on customer/rep testimony.It is known that the device was used for obstructive nephropathy, which is considered a non-extrinsic obstruction.As per ifu, the rms device is intended to be used for ¿temporary stenting of the ureter in adult patients with extrinsic ureteral obstruction.¿ summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer and/or rep testimony.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.As per the literature article, ¿no clinicoradiologic complications or stent-related symptoms have occurred in follow-up.¿ complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Supplemental report is being submitted due to the completion of the investigation on 03-mar-2023.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESONANCE STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key15416599
MDR Text Key306191605
Report Number3001845648-2022-00637
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K063742
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/16/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received08/16/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age44 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-