• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ VAGINAL PANEL; VAGINITIS AND BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS) BD MAX¿ VAGINAL PANEL; VAGINITIS AND BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number 443712
Device Problem Non Reproducible Results (4029)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/24/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ vaginal panel there was a discrepant result.On first run the sample was positive for c.Group, tv and cgla and on repeat the sample was only positive for c.Group.The patient sample was reported as bv negative, c.Group positive, ckru negative, cgla indeterminate and tv indeterminate.There was no patient impact reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported discrepant result 1st run sample was positive for cgroup, tv and cgla.Per our lab protocol, the sample was repeated.On repeat, the sample was only positive for c.Group.Sample reported as bvneg, cgroup pos, ckru neg, c gla indeterminate tv indeterminate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H.6 investigation summary: the complaint investigation for discrepant results with the bd max¿ vaginal panel (ref.(b)(4) ) lot 2117002 was performed by the review of the manufacturing records, customer¿s data analysis and verification of complaints history.Review of the manufacturing records of bd max vaginal panel indicated that lot 2117002 was manufactured according to specifications and met performance requirements.Customer complained about a discrepant result on one sample when the bd max¿ vaginal panel.The sample initially gave a positive result for cgroup, cgla and tv targets in run 3155 lane b10, but when repeated in run 3158 lane a12, it gave only a positive result for the cgroup target.Customer provided the two runs (#3155 and 3158 from instrument cr1423) for investigation.Manual pcr curve adjudication was performed.The initial test (run 3155 lane b10) showed a step dislocation and a high fluorescence in the raw pcr signal, in all channels of the botom cartridge position, compared to the other samples in the same run.The step dislocation caused a cgroup, cgla and tv positive result, and does not appear to be the result of true amplification.When retested in run 3158 a12, there was no issue observed in the fluorescence signal, and the sample remained positive for cgroup target, but tested negative for cgla and tv targets.This cgroup positive result in the repeat test was indicative of a true amplification.The positive results for cgla and tv targets from the initial test (run 3155 lane b10) are caused by an atypical curve.It must be noted that manual pcr curves adjudication has limitations, and the resulting evaluation is a conservative assessment of the data.Bd was unable to identify the cause of these step dislocations, but the issue appears to have been isolated.There is no indication of an increase in complaints for discrepant results for bd max vaginal panel lot 2117002.The root cause of discrepant results was not identified.Bd cannot confirm the complaint based on the investigation that was performed.Bd did not initiate a corrective and preventive action (capa).Bd quality will continue to monitor for trends.H3 other text : see h.10.
 
Event Description
It was reported that while using bd max¿ vaginal panel there was a discrepant result.On first run the sample was positive for c.Group, tv and cgla and on repeat the sample was only positive for c.Group.The patient sample was reported as bv negative, c.Group positive, ckru negative, cgla indeterminate and tv indeterminate.There was no patient impact reported.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: customer reported discrepant result.1st run sample was positive for cgroup, tv and cgla.Per our lab protocol, the sample was repeated.On repeat, the sample was only positive for c.Group.Sample reported as bvneg, cgroup pos, ckru neg, c gla indeterminate tv indeterminate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD MAX¿ VAGINAL PANEL
Type of Device
VAGINITIS AND BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer (Section G)
GENEOHM SCIENCES CANADA, INC. (BD DIAGNOSTICS)
2555 blv. du parc techn
quebec
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8015296192
MDR Report Key15418377
MDR Text Key306279236
Report Number3007420875-2022-00048
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PQA
UDI-Device Identifier00382904437121
UDI-Public00382904437121
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
DEN160001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other
Device Expiration Date04/25/2023
Device Model Number443712
Device Catalogue Number443712
Device Lot Number2117002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/30/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/14/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/10/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/27/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-