Catalog Number 8065750469 |
Device Problems
Energy Output Problem (1431); Failure to Prime (1492)
|
Patient Problems
Corneal Edema (1791); Retinal Tear (2050); Capsular Bag Tear (2639); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
|
Event Date 08/23/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
A physician reported that during a surgery while using a ophthalmic handpiece ultrasound was too strong and the handpiece failed to pass test and error message was displayed in the system.There was a patient harm of capsular tear and corneal edema.Additional information has been requested.Additional information received clarified that the issue happened during combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy surgery for vitreomacular traction syndrome.Patient had also experienced anterior capsular rupture and the issue occurred at the beginning of sculpt/ upon grooves creation in the nucleus or extraction of 1st quadrant during use of ultrasounds.Patient was given with mydriasert before surgery and duovisc, antibiotics at the end of the procedure.Secondary implantation of an artisan type implant planned ten days later.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received clarified that the corneal edema was completely resolved also the corneal sutures removed and a secondary implantation of an artisan type implant was done.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The phacoemulsification (phaco) handpiece was received and a visual assessment of the returned sample revealed no visual nonconformity.The returned phaco handpiece was connected to a calibrated vision system.The phaco handpiece tuned successfully and completed a five minute burn-in test with the system set at 100% ultrasonic and torsional power.The phaco handpiece was connected to dynamic tuning fixture (dtf) for stroke length testing on the longitudinal and torsional movements which found the phaco handpiece to meet product specifications.A phaco handpiece non-conformance based review of the batch/lot/serial number was performed and did not reveal any potential contributing factors to the reported complaint.A manufacturing device history record (dhr) review was performed prior to product release to ensure that the product was manufactured in compliance with the device master record.Based on the assessment, the product met release criteria.A review for complaints reported against this lot/batch/serial number was performed.No similar complaints were reported for the product lot/batch/serial under investigation.The product under investigation is not a serviceable device.Therefore, a service record review was not performed.The phaco handpiece was found to meet specifications; therefore, the root cause of the reported event cannot be determined conclusively.The manufacturer will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|