• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ANTHOLOGY INSERTER POSTER HARD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. ANTHOLOGY INSERTER POSTER HARD; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS Back to Search Results
Model Number 71365705
Device Problem Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problems Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/25/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, during a thr surgery, using the anthology inserter poster hard, the surgeon impacted the redapt slvls mono stem 240mm sz 17 so, reaching the limit he would like.Then tried to disconnect the impactor from the femoral implant and it did not release for anything, so it was necessary to remove the femoral implant and re-grind the femoral canal.The procedure was completed, without delay, using a s+n back-up implant with a larger diameter.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation but a video was provided and reviewed and according to the clinical team it appears to show that the inserter lever is not raised which is to allow for the pommel to unscrew and release the instrument.It is unknown if the lever was stuck in the closed position or if the instruments were used correctly.The redapt revision stem surgical technique implant assembly and insertion steps cautions that the pommel assembly should be secure/not overtightened as may cause lock-up during repeated impacting and also to inspect the inserter prior to use.Additionally, the clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the information provided, user technique cannot be ruled out as a potential contributing factor as the video appears to show that the inserter-lever is not raised to allow for the pommel to unscrew and release the instrument.The redapt revision stem surgical technique implant assembly and insertion steps cautions that the pommel assembly should be secure/not overtightened as may cause lock-up during repeated impacting and also to inspect the inserter prior to use.However, it is unknown if the lever was stuck in the closed position.Reportedly, there was ¿no damage caused, patient's health condition is stable, no surgical delay reported¿.No clinical factors have been identified which would have contributed to the reported event.The assess patient impact included the reported failure of device to disconnect followed by the unplanned intraoperative (revision-stem) removal, ¿re-grind¿/additional reaming, and replacement with a larger-diameter s+n backup stem to complete the revision procedure.There is also an anticipated transient rehabilitation phase; however, further patient impact cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history of the previous 12 months revealed similar events for the listed device, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.A contribution of the devices to the reported event could be corroborated as a back up device was required to complete the procedure.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: d9, h3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection reveals some signs of wear and use.A functional evaluation reveals the threading on the tip is damaged causing the device not to connect to a mating device as intended.The reported event could be confirmed.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that based on the information provided, user technique cannot be ruled out as a potential contributing factor as the video appears to show that the inserter-lever is not raised to allow for the pommel to unscrew and release the instrument.The redapt revision stem surgical technique implant assembly and insertion steps cautions that the pommel assembly should be secure/not overtightened as may cause lock-up during repeated impacting and also to inspect the inserter prior to use.However, it is unknown if the lever was stuck in the closed position.Reportedly, there was ¿no damage caused, patient's health condition is stable, no surgical delay reported¿.No clinical factors have been identified which would have contributed to the reported event.The assess patient impact included the reported failure of device to disconnect followed by the unplanned intraoperative (revision-stem) removal, ¿re-grind¿/additional reaming, and replacement with a larger-diameter s+n backup stem to complete the revision procedure.There is also an anticipated transient rehabilitation phase; however, further patient impact cannot be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal any manufacturing or material abnormalities that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A review of the instructions for use file is not applicable for this instrument.As the device can no longer fit its purpose, the contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely potential factors that could contribute to the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.H6, h10.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ANTHOLOGY INSERTER POSTER HARD
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/CERAMIC/POLYMER, CEMENTED OR NON-POROUS
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15461743
MDR Text Key300309150
Report Number1020279-2022-04131
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LZO
UDI-Device Identifier03596010555663
UDI-Public03596010555663
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K113789
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number71365705
Device Catalogue Number71365705
Device Lot Number19AM06476
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/26/2022
Initial Date FDA Received09/21/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/13/2022
02/03/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/19/2022
02/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/08/2019
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
REDAPT SLVLS MONO STEM 240MM SZ 17 SO, LOT#:19BTM0
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-