A male patient underwent an aquablation procedure for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (bph).Procept biorobotics corporation became aware that during the aquablation procedure there was no movement of the high-velocity waterjet on the aquabeam handpiece.Several troubleshooting steps were taken in an attempt to address the issue, including replacing the aquabeam handpiece three (3) times without success.As a result, the aquablation procedure was aborted and converted to transurethral resection of the prostate (turp) surgery.There were no adverse health consequences to the patient due to this event.
|
H.10 additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation of the returned aquabeam handpiece confirmed that the device had been severed and the severed portion was not returned for investigation, not allowing for functional testing to confirm the reported failure mode.A review of the device history record (dhr) ab2000-b rev g / serial number (b)(6) / lot number 21c01835 was conducted, which confirmed that there were no non-conformances, failures, discrepancies, or missed steps during the manufacturing process that could be related to the reported event.The review indicated that the system and associated component met all design and manufacturing specifications when released for distribution.The aquabeam robotic system instructions for use (ifu), ifu0101-00, rev.E, was reviewed and states the following: 8.24 sterile: align waterjet nozzle by doing the following: a.Rotate the trus stepper cradle (if needed) to center the aquabeam handpiece hyperechoic artifact with the vertical yellow line.B.Press the foot pedal to visualize position of waterjet (retract trus probe if needed by using knobs on trus stepper).C.Waterjet needs to be visible at 3 or 9 o'clock.D.If slightly off, depress the black button on the mag block (located on the handpiece articulating arm) and rotate the aquabeam handpiece axis while stepping on foot pedal to align jets to 3 and 9 o'clock position.A root cause for the reported event could not be determined due to the condition of the returned handpiece, which did not allow functional testing to be conducted.Submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the manufacturer's product caused or contributed to the event.
|